Testing ATL14 gridded land ice download from earthdata #289
Conversation
|
I will automatically update this comment whenever this PR is modified
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## development #289 +/- ##
===============================================
+ Coverage 66.19% 66.22% +0.02%
===============================================
Files 36 36
Lines 3065 3064 -1
Branches 541 540 -1
===============================================
Hits 2029 2029
+ Misses 945 944 -1
Partials 91 91 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Looks like the issue with adding this test is now #286. |
|
Ok, but I might as well add some unit tests for ATL14 since I've been playing with it recently. Will see what I can do to increase code coverage. |
Sounds great (and wasn't suggesting we not add the tests already here). Just noticed that now that #288 is resolved with updated certificates at NSIDC, the failing Travis errors were "updated" to #286. |
|
See #291 |
Not using Iceland's spatial extent, because it overlaps with the Greenland bounding box and causes the unit test to download >1GB of data.
Easier to debug what specific tests went wrong
Loop through each key one at a time, so that it's easier to debug when keys are missing.
Created using `json.dump(obj=obs, fp=open("ATL06v06_options.json", "w"))`.
Shouldn't be needed since $NSIDC_LOGIN is already set?
…ble" This reverts commit a813fa4.
|
Hi @rwegener2, could you give this a review if you have time, since you recently worked on the #435 PR? |
Absolutely, @weiji14. I've been offline for a day or two while moving apartments, but I'll take a look this afternoon. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good to me @weiji14. Nothing really changed with respect to authentication as far as I can tell, was there something specific you wanted a second set of eyes on? The ATL14/06 specific bits I am less familiar with, but from my experience everything looks solid!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@weiji14 If I'm understanding this right, we've added ATL14 as part of the fixture, but then don't actually run any tests on it beyond creating a query object with those parameters (in which case, shouldn't we just create a query object with it elsewhere instead of in test_behind_NSIDC_API_login.py). That or the assertions in lines 50-51 will fail because there's no appropriate json file for the ATL14 custom options...
Adding unit tests for ATL14 data access via Earthdata, using a region over Svalbard (Iceland is smaller, but bounding box overlaps with Greenland which is big).
Towards resolving #288, but also updating tests behind NSIDC login for the ATL06 dataset by updating from v05 to v06.