Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate Fullchain tests to Hardhat and convert them to full integration tests #156

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

zguesmi
Copy link
Member

@zguesmi zguesmi commented Nov 7, 2024

No description provided.

@zguesmi zguesmi self-assigned this Nov 7, 2024
@zguesmi zguesmi marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2024 16:29
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (develop@825209a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop     #156   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   84.67%           
==========================================
  Files              ?       35           
  Lines              ?     1083           
  Branches           ?      201           
==========================================
  Hits               ?      917           
  Misses             ?      166           
  Partials           ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

test/000_fullchain.test.ts Show resolved Hide resolved

it('[5] No sponsorship, no beneficiary, no callback, no BoT, no replication', async function () {});

describe.skip('MatchOrders', function () {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why skip it instead of removing it?
There are ts issues. Maybe we could add something like // @ts-nocheck if we don't want to remove it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't remove the file to respect a "PR size" metric that we have defined in the past. We can discuss it offchain.
I will add the annotation yes, it's a good idea.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems the annotation can only be added to the hole file.
Instead of adding it I will remove the block in the next PR.

test/000_fullchain.js.skip Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jeremyjams jeremyjams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you :)

test/000_fullchain.test.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
test/000_fullchain.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/utils/IexecWrapper.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jeremyjams jeremyjams merged commit 428d469 into develop Nov 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@jeremyjams jeremyjams deleted the feature/migrate-fullchain branch November 12, 2024 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants