Skip to content

Using W3C Web Access Control vocabulary to protect Hydra APIs

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

hypermedia-app/web-access-control

Repository files navigation

web-access-control

Querying Web Access Control entries over a SPARQL endpoint to authorize access to resources.

What it does?

Given the accessed resource and an agent, it executes queries to see if that agent should be granted access to said resource.

Currently, the library makes some assumptions about the store structure:

  1. Protected resources and ACLs have to be in the same store
  2. The default graph is queried. Consult your store so that the union graph is used as the active dataset

See below for more details.

Examples

Check the examples file for various instances of acl:Autorization resources.

hydra-web-access-control

Protects Hydra APIs running kopflos.

Instances of hydra:Operation can be annotated with a acl:mode property to force this access mode being checked:

@prefix acl: <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#> .
@prefix hydra: <http://www.w3.org/ns/hydra/core#> .

[
  a hydra:Operation ;
  hydra:method "POST" ;
  acl:mode acl:Write ;
] .

If not explicitly stated, the HTTP method will be mapped:

method access mode
GET acl:Read
HEAD acl:Read
OPTIONS acl:Read
POST acl:Write
PUT acl:Write
PATCH acl:Write
DELETE acl:Write

Setup

The setup requires creating an express middleware by providing a SPARQL client instance (sparql-http-client), and a function to get the current user's (agent's) Graph Pointer.

import express from 'express'
import { rdf, acl } from '@tpluscode/rdf-ns-builders'
import SparqlClient from 'sparql-http-client'
import * as kopflos from '@kopflos-api/core'
import accessControl from 'hydra-web-access-control' 
 
const app = express()

const client = new SparqlClient({
  endpoint: 'http://query.example.com/sparql'
})

// assume that there is an earlier middleware
// which creates the agent resource
app.use((req, res, next) => {
  // in this example it creates a user by hand, 
  // from info provided by express-basic-auth.
  // typically, would load from a store
  req.agent = req.env.clownface()
    .namedNode(`urn:user:${req.auth.user}`)
    .addOut(rdf.type, acl.AuthenticatedAgent)
  
  next()
})

// the middleware will access req.agent to get its URI and RDF types
// it needs to be configured as a hydra-box resource middleware
app.use(hydraBox.middleware(api, {
  middleware: {
    resource: [
      accessControl({ client })
    ]
  }
}))

Per-request authorization restrictions

A function of array of functions can be optionally passed to the middleware. They take an RDF/JS variable, and the current request object as parameters and should return additional SPARQL patterns to filter out ACL authorization resources as desired.

import accessControl from 'hydra-access-control'
import { Variable } from '@rdfjs/types'
import { Request } from 'express'

const middleware =  accessControl({ 
    client,
    additionalPatterns(acl: Variable, req: Request) {
        // ...
    }
 })

See below for a complete example. The only difference is that the hydra-box-web-access-control adds the second parameter while the other accepts only one.

rdf-web-access-control

The underlying library used by hydra-web-access-control middleware.

Check user access to resource

import { check } from 'rdf-web-access-control'

const hasAccess: boolean = await check({
  accessMode,         // subclass of acl:Access, such as acl:Read or acl:Write
  agent,              // agent Graph Pointer
  term,               // resource URI
  client,             // sparql-http-client
  additionalPatterns, // function(s) to add more filters
})

For the given agent <A> and (optionally) resource <R>, it will prepare and execute a SPARQL query, looking for any instances of acl:Authorization which satisfy one of possible combinations:

  1. Direct access grant
    • [ acl:agent <A> ; acl:accessTo <R> ]
  2. Direct grant for class of agents
    • [ acl:agent ?typeofAgentA ; acl:accessTo <R> ]
  3. Access granted to class of resources
    • [ acl:agent <A> ; acl:accessTo ?typeofResourceR ]
  4. Access granted to class of resources for class of agents
    • [ acl:agent ?typeofAgentA ; acl:accessTo ?typeofResourceR ]
  5. Agent owns resource
    • <R> ac:owner <A>

Check user access to type of resource

Alternatively, if no specific resource is given, it is possible provide the RDF types instead of an identifier. Such would be the case when creating new resources.

import { check } from 'rdf-web-access-control'

const hasAccess: boolean = await check({
  accessMode, // subclass of acl:Access, such as acl:Read or acl:Write
  agent,      // agent Graph Pointer
  types,      // array of RDF types
  client,     // sparql-http-client
})

This will only query for acl:Authorization using acl:accessToClass.

Controling access

All queries will include add acl:Control mode so that it grants automatic access to the otherwise specified resource/agent combinations.

All queries will include checks for foaf:Agent and acl:AuthenticatedUser to allow creating ACL entries for anonymous users and any authenticated users respectively.

All queries will implicitly add rdfs:Resource to the queries types. Given a store with inferencing capabilities and the use of rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource, it would be possible to have an ACL entry such, that it grants access to "any resource".

@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix acl: <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#> .

# Any authenticated user has read access to any resource
<>
  a acl:Authorization ;
  acl:mode acl:Read ;
  acl:agentClass acl:AuthenticatedAgent ;
  acl:accessToClass rdfs:Resource ;
.

Custom authorization checks

By default, the authorization will only occur using the acl:agent and acl:agentClass properties. Both or those strategies only use information provided by the caller, thus not impacting the query greatly.

To provide more alternative ways to authorize agents, use the additionalChecks argument, by providing an array of functions which must return SPARQL pattern template or a RDF/JS Dataset with pattern triples.

As an example, below is the implementation of using acl:agentGroup. It can be imported from rdf-web-access-control/checks

import { sparql } from '@tpluscode/sparql-builder'
import { acl, vcard } from '@tpluscode/rdf-ns-builders'
import type { AuthorizationPatterns } from 'rdf-web-access-control'

export const agentGroup: AuthorizationPatterns = ({ agent, authorization }) => {
  return sparql`${authorization} ${acl.agentGroup}/${vcard.hasMember} ${agent} .`
}

Additional authorization restrictions

It is possible to restrict considered instances of acl:Authorization, for example to select only ACLs valid for given timeframe or by a custom property.

Every one of the "additional patterns" will be applied to every check, ie. acl:agent, acl:agentClass and the optional additionalChecks described above.

To do that, pass a function to the check call, which will return partial SPARQL patterns. It takes an RDF/JS Variable object as input which will match the ACL resources in the query.

import { Variable } from '@rdfjs/types'
import { schema } from '@tpluscode/rdf-ns-builders'
import { sparql } from '@tpluscode/sparql-builder'
import { toRdf } from 'rdf-literal'
import { check } from 'rdf-web-access-control' 

const hasAccess: boolean = check({
  additionalPatterns(acl: Variable) {
    return sparql`
      ${acl} ${schema.validThrough} ?validThrough .
      FILTER( ?validThrough >= ${toRdf(new Date())})
    `
  }
})

It is also possible to pass an array of multiple such SPARQL-building functions.

Similar applies to configuring the hydra-web-access-control middleware.

About

Using W3C Web Access Control vocabulary to protect Hydra APIs

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages