fix sourcery's suggestions

[bleudev]

closes #21

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request addresses several issues in the UDict class, including fixing dictionary initialization, item setting logic, length calculation, iteration, and boolean checks. Additionally, new tests have been added to verify these fixes and ensure proper exception handling.

• Bug Fixes:
  • Fixed incorrect handling of dictionary initialization in UDict class.
  • Corrected the logic for setting item values in UDict to handle lists and tuples properly.
  • Fixed the length calculation method to return the correct dictionary length.
  • Corrected the iteration method to iterate over dictionary items instead of a non-existent 'items' attribute.
  • Fixed the boolean check method to use the correct magic method 'bool' instead of 'nonzero'.
• Tests:
  • Added tests to verify the behavior of UDict initialization with different parameters.
  • Included tests to check the handling of non-existent keys in UDict.
  • Added tests to ensure proper exception handling in the 'get' method of UDict.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request addresses issue #21 by implementing several suggestions from Sourcery to improve the code quality and functionality of the UDict class and its associated tests. The changes include refactoring code for better readability, adding new test cases, and fixing existing ones.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
tests/test_udict.py ufpy/udict.py	Refactored methods for better readability and efficiency, added new test cases, and fixed existing ones to ensure comprehensive coverage and correct functionality.

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Привет, @bleudev - я просмотрел ваши изменения, и они выглядят отлично!

Вот что я рассмотрел во время проверки

• 🟡 Общие проблемы: найдено 3 проблемы
• 🟢 Безопасность: все выглядит хорошо
• 🟡 Тестирование: найдено 3 проблемы
• 🟢 Сложность: все выглядит хорошо

---

Sourcery бесплатен для open source - если вам нравятся наши обзоры, пожалуйста, подумайте о том, чтобы поделиться ими ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Помогите мне быть полезнее! Пожалуйста, нажмите 👍 или 👎 на каждый комментарий, чтобы сообщить, был ли он полезен.}

Original comment in English

Hey @bleudev - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 3 issues found
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[bleudev]

@sourcery-ai review

[sourcery-ai]

Мы пропустили проверку этого pull request. Похоже, что мы уже проверили этот pull request.

Original comment in English

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It looks like we've already reviewed this pull request.

[bleudev]

Approving this PR to be merge!