Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mirror: linter that suggest using alternative string/[]byte functions #3825

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 1, 2023

Conversation

butuzov
Copy link
Member

@butuzov butuzov commented May 8, 2023

mirror - linter suggest alternative functions while working with strings/[]byte (e.g. strings.HasPrefix and bytes.HasPrefix, if it alternative can be used).

  • gocritic as experimental implementation of io.Writer and io.StringWriter detection, which is fitting to the functionality of mirror, but mirror instead checking additional functions from std lib, ignoring (for now) interface checking for io.Writer / io.StringWriter
  • Currently intentionally ignoring constructions like this (in TODO)
    (&maphash.Hash{}).Write(aliasBytes("foobar"))

@butuzov butuzov added the linter: new Support new linter label May 8, 2023
@butuzov butuzov self-assigned this May 8, 2023
@butuzov butuzov added the feedback required Requires additional feedback label May 8, 2023
@golangci golangci deleted a comment from butuzov May 8, 2023
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented May 8, 2023

In order for a pull request adding a linter to be reviewed, the linter and the PR must follow some requirements.

  • The CLA must be signed

Pull Request Description

  • It must have a link to the linter repository.
  • It must provide a short description of the linter.

Linter

  • It must not be a duplicate of another linter or a rule of a linter. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have a valid license (AGPL is not allowed) and the file must contain the required information by the license, ex: author, year, etc.
  • The linter repository must have a CI and tests.
  • It must use go/analysis.
  • It must have a valid tag, ex: v1.0.0, v0.1.0.
  • It must not contain init().
  • It must not contain panic(), log.fatal(), os.exit(), or similar.
  • It must not have false positives/negatives. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have tests inside golangci-lint.

The Linter Tests Inside Golangci-lint

  • They must have at least one std lib import.
  • They must work with T=<name of the linter test file>.go make test_linters. (the team will help to verify that)

.golangci.reference.yml

  • The linter must be added to the list of available linters (alphabetical case-insensitive order).
    • enable and disable options
  • If the linter has a configuration, the exhaustive configuration of the linter must be added (alphabetical case-insensitive order)
    • The values must be different from the default ones.
    • The default values must be defined in a comment.
    • The option must have a short description.

Others Requirements

  • The files (tests and linter) inside golangci-lint must have the same name as the linter.
  • The .golangci.yml of golangci-lint itself must not be edited and the linter must not be added to this file.
  • The linters must be sorted in the alphabetical order (case-insensitive) in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...) and .golangci.reference.yml.
  • The load mode (WithLoadMode(...)):
    • if the linter doesn't use types: goanalysis.LoadModeSyntax
    • goanalysis.LoadModeTypesInfo required WithLoadForGoAnalysis() in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...)
  • The version in WithSince(...) must be the next minor version (v1.X.0) of golangci-lint.

Recommendations

  • The linter should not use SSA. (currently, SSA does not fully support generics)
  • The linter repository should have a readme and linting.
  • The linter should be published as a binary. (useful to diagnose bug origins)

The golangci-lint team will edit this comment to check the boxes before and during the review.

The code review will start after the completion of those checkboxes (except for the specific items that the team will help to verify).

If the author of the PR is a member of the golangci-lint team, he should not edit this message.

This checklist does not imply that we will accept the linter.

@butuzov butuzov marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2023 11:47
@butuzov butuzov requested a review from ldez May 8, 2023 11:48
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented May 8, 2023

If the author of the PR is a member of the golangci-lint team, he should not edit this message.

@butuzov
Copy link
Member Author

butuzov commented May 8, 2023

If the author of the PR is a member of the golangci-lint team, he should not edit this message.

After I read last line - I have uncheck "The linter must be added to the list of available linters (alphabetical case-insensitive order)." (and few others), so my hands are clear!

@ldez ldez removed the feedback required Requires additional feedback label May 8, 2023
@hansgylling
Copy link

Don't add this linter before the data race bug is fixed: butuzov/mirror#17

@hansgylling
Copy link

hansgylling commented May 12, 2023

Don't add this linter before the data race bug is fixed: butuzov/mirror#17

The data race bug is now fixed on the main branch in the mirror repo, but there's no new release that includes the fix yet.

@butuzov
Copy link
Member Author

butuzov commented May 12, 2023

Don't add this linter before the data race bug is fixed: butuzov/mirror#17

The data race bug is now fixed on the main branch in the mirror repo, but there's no new release that includes the fix yet.

As I did a fix and introduced SuggestedFixes to mirror itself, I also wanted to add the ability to fix code via golangci-lint. However, I am a bit busy with military things going around. Will try to update this branch within a week or so and try to come up with a solution asap.

@bombsimon
Copy link
Member

As I did a fix and introduced SuggestedFixes to mirror itself, I also wanted to add the ability to fix code via golangci-lint. However, I am a bit busy with military things going around. Will try to update this branch within a week or so and try to come up with a solution asap.

There's an issue for this in #1779. Also there was a fix in #2609 that got closed.

@butuzov
Copy link
Member Author

butuzov commented May 13, 2023

Hi @bombsimon for now mirror will perform only online fixes, as multiline fixes are not supported also because I cannot spend more time digging around SuggestedFixes. That is good enough (for now).

@butuzov
Copy link
Member Author

butuzov commented Jun 1, 2023

@ldez is the anything else I can do to make my PR better? (may be I am missing something)

pkg/golinters/mirror.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jun 1, 2023

This linter is closed to a gocritic rule but as those rules are experimental and the linter handles a specific case, we can accept it.
Maybe, in the future, this linter will be improved or merged into gocritic rules.

Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

For people that will watch this PR, please think to support his author: butuzov

@hansgylling
Copy link

This linter is closed to a gocritic rule but as this rule is experimental and the linter handles a specific case, we can accept it. Maybe, in the future, this linter will be improved or merged into gocritic rule.

Which gocritic rule is that? We use gocritic and I imagine that we probably use such a rule, but mirror points out other cases that our current configuration of gocritic hasn't found.

@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Jun 1, 2023

The following experimental go-critic rules:

@butuzov
Copy link
Member Author

butuzov commented Jun 1, 2023

LGTM

thanks!

For people that will watch this PR, please think to support his author: butuzov

And thank you again!

@ldez ldez merged commit 9f2528a into golangci:master Jun 1, 2023
16 checks passed
@ldez ldez added this to the v1.53 milestone Mar 6, 2024
@ldez ldez added the enhancement New feature or improvement label Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement linter: new Support new linter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants