Skip to content

update notes on make vs. cmake usage #1262

update notes on make vs. cmake usage

update notes on make vs. cmake usage #1262

Workflow file for this run

name: "Static Analysis"
on:
push:
pull_request:
branches: [ latest ]
schedule:
- cron: '18 6 * * 2'
jobs:
local-analysis:
name: "custom analysis"
runs-on: "ubuntu-latest"
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
- name: Check Headers
run: |
tools/check_headers/check_headers.rb "include/**/*.h*" "include/**/**/*.h"
tools/check_headers/check_headers.rb "src/**/*.c"
tools/check_headers/check_headers.rb "test/**/*.cpp"
tools/check_headers/check_headers.rb "docs/examples/**/*.c"
- name: Check Localization
run: |
scripts/check_l10n.rb "include/private/config/locale/*-??.h"
- name: Build Documentation
run: |
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install doxygen
cmake .
make docs
codeql-analysis:
name: "codeql analysis"
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
language: [ 'cpp' ]
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
- name: Initialize CodeQL
uses: github/codeql-action/init@0116bc2df50751f9724a2e35ef1f24d22f90e4e1 # v2.22.3
with:
languages: ${{ matrix.language }}
- name: Autobuild
uses: github/codeql-action/autobuild@0116bc2df50751f9724a2e35ef1f24d22f90e4e1 # v2.22.3
- name: Perform CodeQL Analysis
uses: github/codeql-action/analyze@0116bc2df50751f9724a2e35ef1f24d22f90e4e1 # v2.22.3
sonarcloud-analysis:
name: "sonarcloud analysis"
runs-on: "ubuntu-latest"
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Configure
run: |
cmake .
- name: Sonarcloud Analysis
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' || github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository }}
run: |
wget -q https://sonarcloud.io/static/cpp/build-wrapper-linux-x86.zip
unzip build-wrapper-linux-x86.zip
./build-wrapper-linux-x86/build-wrapper-linux-x86-64 --out-dir bw-output make all
wget -q https://binaries.sonarsource.com/Distribution/sonar-scanner-cli/sonar-scanner-cli-5.0.1.3006-linux.zip
unzip -qq -o sonar-scanner-cli-5.0.1.3006-linux.zip
chmod +x sonar-scanner-5.0.1.3006-linux/bin/sonar-scanner
sonar-scanner-5.0.1.3006-linux/bin/sonar-scanner -Dproject.settings=tools/sonar/sonar-project.properties
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}
SONARQUBE_SCANNER_PARAMS: '{"sonar.host.url":"https://sonarcloud.io"}'
custom-anaysis:
name: Custom Analysis
runs-on: "ubuntu-latest"
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: "@since standardization"
run: |
# look for all instances of @since, then look for any that do not meet the required pattern. @since release x.x.x
if grep --include=\*.{c,h,cpp,hpp} -rnw . -e ".*@since .*" | grep -qv ".* @since release v[[:digit:]]\+\.[[:digit:]]\+\.[[:digit:]].*"; then
# at this point the check has failed, but we want to give some info to the user. i have found it difficult to get the status code
# and print out the offending lines without this duplication
# get all instances of @since, offending and not offending
grep --include=\*.{c,h,cpp,hpp} -rnw . -e "@since .*" | \
# find all instances that do not meet the required pattern
grep -v ".* @since release v[[:digit:]]\+\.[[:digit:]]\+\.[[:digit:]].*" | \
# print an error message, including line number with -n from grep. mention supported format.
xargs -I{} echo "Static Analysis Failed: \"{}\" Supported format is \"@since release vX.X.X\""
exit 1
else
exit 0
fi
release-version-and-date-analysis:
name: "release version and date analysis"
runs-on: "ubuntu-latest"
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Release Version and Date Analysis
run: |
# search for release and date line from CITATION.cff with format:
# 'version: X.X.X' and 'date-released: XXXX-XX-XX' then extract to variables
# find the line with each, then extract the value wanted (version number or date) as well as line number
version_citation_info=$(grep -n -E -m1 '^version: [0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+' "CITATION.cff")
version_citation_line=$(echo "$version_citation_info" | cut -d: -f1)
version_citation=$(echo "$version_citation_info" | awk '{print $2}')
date_citation_info=$(grep -n -E -m1 'date-released: [0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}' "CITATION.cff")
date_citation_line=$(echo "$date_citation_info" | cut -d: -f1)
date_citation=$(echo "$date_citation_info" | awk '{print $2}')
# search for version and date line from ChangeLog.md with format:
# '## [X.X.X] - [XX-XX-XXXX]'
# find most recent line with version and date of release in ChangeLog.md
vd_changelog_info=$(grep -n -E -m1 '## \[[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\] - [0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}' "ChangeLog.md")
vd_changelog_line=$(echo "$vd_changelog_info" | cut -d: -f1)
# extract version, date and line number (since it's always on one line) to variables
version_changelog=$(echo "$vd_changelog_info" | awk -F'[][]' '{print $2}')
date_changelog=$(echo "$vd_changelog_info" | awk -F' - ' '{print $2}')
# compare version numbers and dates between files, listing discrepancies where found
if [[ "$version_changelog" != "$version_citation" ]]; then
echo "Release version numbers do not match: $version_changelog (ChangeLog.md on line $vd_changelog_line) vs $version_citation (CITATION.cff on line $version_citation_line)"
exit 1
fi
if [[ "$date_changelog" != "$date_citation" ]]; then
echo "Release dates do not match: $date_changelog (ChangeLog.md on line $vd_changelog_line) vs $date_citation (CITATION.cff on line $date_citation_line)"
exit 1
fi