-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add command to propagate annotations #89
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
cff4620
to
e6af10d
Compare
3669223
to
83aca0b
Compare
|
||
let mut path_mappings_by_name = HashMap::new(); | ||
for (name, target_path) in target_paths_by_name.iter() { | ||
let source_path = source_paths_by_name.get(name).unwrap(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we assume the 2 sample groups need the same paths?
// Replaced (15, 25) with a 2 bp sequence | ||
// New gene annotation is (5, 15) | ||
assert_eq!(record.start().get(), 5); | ||
assert_eq!(record.end().get(), 15); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what happens if we throw an insert into a gene? wondering if we split it up or just extend it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only question is about requiring paths to match. I think that lookup can be on-demand cache in an anonymous function.
No description provided.