Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate circleci worklfows to github actions #7974

Conversation

robandpdx
Copy link

This pull request converts the CircleCI workflows to GitHub actions workflows.

The GitHub actions workflows need runner groups with larger runners configured for the organization.

The following runner group is needed:

  • 32-core

For my testing, I have these runner groups populated with the following runners:

Group Runner size OS
32-core 32-cores · 128 GB RAM · 1200 GB SSD Ubuntu Latest

Issues
There are issue with some of the workflow that someone smarter than me needs to address.

  1. linux-pr-fuzzer-run
    This appears to fail getting the merge base. I'm not sure why this is happening.

  2. linux-adapters
    The error is...

ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:98: build] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/__w/velox/velox'
make: *** [Makefile:105: release] Error 2
Error: Process completed with exit code 2.

https://fburl.com/workplace/f6mz6tmw

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 11, 2023

Deploy Preview for meta-velox canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5f33dfe
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/meta-velox/deploys/65779fd07c82a70008cfc830

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Dec 11, 2023
@kgpai kgpai requested review from kgpai and assignUser December 13, 2023 01:02
@kgpai
Copy link
Contributor

kgpai commented Dec 13, 2023

Thanks @robandpdx for this work. Please give us a day or so to verify that this works.

@assignUser
Copy link
Collaborator

This is great thanks, I'll have a look soon, we can probably unify the fuzzer stuff with the existing scheduled.yml etc.. Any objections to me pushing to this PR directly?

@robandpdx I see we have access to the new m1 runners, very nice! I think the fuzzer job is the only one using the 32core runner and we can probably downgrade that (we have done that with the scheduled runs already see #7842 ).

@robandpdx
Copy link
Author

I think the fuzzer job is the only one using the 32core runner and we can probably downgrade that (we have done that with the scheduled runs already see #7842 ).

@assignUser No objections to pushing to this PR or my branch. My fork is public and I've added you as a collaborator there. It makes sense to downgrade jobs to a smaller runners if possible, for cost control. I'm happy to help reorganize stuff if needed with some direction from folks in the know here. Just let me know how I can help.

@assignUser
Copy link
Collaborator

@robandpdx Thanks for your work. We have discussed offline and will consolidate and rework the jobs to remove redundancies and make better use of gha capabilities. Therefor we are going to split this into multiple PRs (as well as for reviewability :) ).

You have some cool ideas here that I am going to reuse in the reworked builds, would you like to be pinged on those? I would appreciate your experience but I understand if you don't have the bw.

@robandpdx
Copy link
Author

You have some cool ideas here that I am going to reuse in the reworked builds, would you like to be pinged on those?

@assignUser Sure! I'm happy to help.

@bigfootjon
Copy link
Contributor

@assignUser: AFAICT all CircleCI workflows have been migrated to GitHub and all that remains is a "noop" workflow. Can we delete that workflow and disable CircleCI? (and close this PR?)

@kgpai
Copy link
Contributor

kgpai commented Apr 3, 2024

@bigfootjon I plan to do disable CCI by Friday, we just migrated all this and wanted to be sure there are no regressions before turning off CCI.

@assignUser
Copy link
Collaborator

But we can close this PR immediately :)

@assignUser assignUser closed this Apr 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants