Fix formatting and bug in pseudocode in patricia-merkle-trie
#14486
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Prior to the change the doc wasn't formatted for Python code, even though mostly Python syntax is used,
which might've lead to decrease in comprehension as the syntax wasn't highlighted.
All the code was formatted with the Black formatter to ease comprehension.
Additionally, the following line contained bug:
```python
if node = '': return ''
```
The comparison operator (==) was likely meant.
Privat33r-dev
requested review from
wackerow,
corwintines,
pettinarip and
minimalsm
as code owners
✅ Deploy Preview for ethereumorg ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to the change the doc wasn't formatted for Python code, even though mostly Python syntax is used, which might've lead to decrease in comprehension as the syntax wasn't highlighted.
All the code was formatted with the Black formatter to ease comprehension.
Additionally, the following line contained bug:
The comparison operator (==) was likely meant.
Description
Related Issue