-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Main language for evaluations #2367
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Main language for evaluations #2367
Conversation
with self.assertRaises(ValueError): | ||
form["main_language"] = "some_other_wrong_value" | ||
form.submit(name="operation", value="save") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Like the "Invalid value doesn't work"-block in 303, I think this will already fail on setting the form field as django webtest throws when we try to set a value that is not in the choices list. I think testing that server-side validation works is a good idea here, not sure if it can be done with WebTest form framework though. I think in the past we always manually crafted POST requests to achieve this.
def _migrate(apps, schema_editor): | ||
Evaluation = apps.get_model("evaluation", "Evaluation") | ||
for evaluation in Evaluation.objects.filter(state__gte=40): | ||
evaluation.main_language = "de" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why? I would have expected "undecided" (which is the default value -> no explicit migration code needed?)
(If we keep this, can we use some named variable instead of the magic 40?)
def editor_approve(self): | ||
pass | ||
|
||
@transition( | ||
field=state, | ||
source=[State.NEW, State.PREPARED, State.EDITOR_APPROVED], | ||
target=State.APPROVED, | ||
conditions=[lambda self: self.general_contribution_has_questionnaires], | ||
conditions=[lambda self: self.general_contribution_has_questionnaires and self.has_valid_main_language], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue says that staff users should be able to set "undecided". I think this change here would block that workflow?
@@ -1920,6 +1920,38 @@ def test_evaluation_create(self): | |||
form.submit() | |||
self.assertEqual(Evaluation.objects.get().name_de, "lfo9e7bmxp1xi") | |||
|
|||
def _set_valid_form(self, form): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
factoring out the helper is nice -- but we should also use it in test_evaluation_create
then :D
self.assertNotEqual(Evaluation.objects.first().state, self.evaluation.State.APPROVED) | ||
|
||
form["main_language"] = "en" | ||
form.submit("operation", value="approve") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We probably have to add an assertion that the response now doesn't contain the above error anymore (our views return 200 even if there is a business logic error / form validation failed)
raise SuspiciousOperation("Invalid POST operation") | ||
|
||
evaluation_form = EvaluationForm( | ||
request.POST or None, instance=evaluation, semester=evaluation.course.semester, operation=operation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
random consideration: A narrower, more precise interface would be passing require_main_language: bool
instead of passing an operation string that implicitly allows to infer that bool
data-bs-placement="bottom" | ||
title="{{ language_name }}" | ||
role="button" | ||
href="{% url 'student:vote' evaluation.pk %}?language={{ language_code }}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should probably be a POST-form, not a GET-anchor. (Currently, this wouldn't need the CSRF token)
No description provided.