Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

Feature proposal for job-shop-scheduling #66

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 25, 2019
Merged

Conversation

mziele1
Copy link
Contributor

@mziele1 mziele1 commented Jul 1, 2019

I have two features that I think would improve the usability and performance of the job-shop-scheduling demo.

First, for jobs larger than those in the demo/testing files get_bqm may fail on the dwavebinarycsp.stitch if the default max_graph_size is too small. My first commit allows parameters to be passed through to dwavebinarycsp.stitch.

Second, the current variable pruning does not take advantage of knowledge of all tasks (I believe the TODO refers to this). Variables of a task are pruned only on their position within a job, and their duration. Pruning can be improved considering the duration of predecessor and successor tasks. The changes for this are in the second commit.

@mziele1 mziele1 requested a review from m3ller as a code owner July 1, 2019 03:15
Copy link
Contributor

@m3ller m3ller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your code submission and for your interest in this project!

I think your feature ideas are great! I just have some suggestions on the way these ideas are implemented.

job-shop-scheduling/job_shop_scheduler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
job-shop-scheduling/test_job_shop_scheduler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
job-shop-scheduling/job_shop_scheduler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
job-shop-scheduling/job_shop_scheduler.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
job-shop-scheduling/job_shop_scheduler.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@m3ller m3ller merged commit e194cd6 into dwavesystems:master Jul 25, 2019
@m3ller m3ller mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants