-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(docs): proposal loading mechanism #639
Conversation
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Thanks @ArtieReus for preparing this document. 👍 Despite having concerns, IMO we might not need to take this architectural decision right now because whether we do it in one way or the other it barely affects the overall functionality of the host or extension applications. And this loading mechanism can be changed later in a less intrusive manner when we'll have more more information/requirements. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This helped me to be informed about the new generation of our shell app, so thank you 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank You for the call! I'm informed. 🙏🙈🤪
Summary
The goal of this proposal is to consolidate all information regarding the extension loading mechanism into a single, comprehensive document. It aims to clearly outline all discussed options with when possible with a decision, eliminating any potential misunderstandings, and to establish consensus on the approach that best fits the project’s needs.
Changes Made
Related Issues