Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: init workspace tools adr #11

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
84 changes: 84 additions & 0 deletions architecture-decision-records/010-greenhouse-workspace-tools.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
# 010-greenhouse-workstation-tools

- Status: [draft] <!-- optional -->
- Deciders: [HGW, Esther, Uwe] <!-- optional -->
- Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional. To customize the ordering without relying on Git creation dates and filenames -->
- Tags: [greenhouse / cloudoperators] <!-- optional -->
- Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->

## Context and Problem Statement

Provide Greenhouse operators with pre-authenticated, pre-installed CLI like hammer/screw, openstackcli, kubectl, spore, vault, u8s.
Have some sort of startup logon script that scopes the user to the correct project and region. (like `setpw` on jumphost)

## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->

- [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
- [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
- … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->

## Considered Options

- [option 1]
- [option 2]
- [option 3]
- … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->

## Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "[option 1]",
because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].

### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->

- [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
- …

### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->

- [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
- …

## Pros and Cons of the Options | Evaluation of options <!-- optional -->

### [option 1]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | |
| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] |
| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] |
| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] |

### [option 2]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | |
| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] |
| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] |
| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] |

### [option 3]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | |
| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] |
| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] |
| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] |

## Related Decision Records <!-- optional -->

[previous decision record, e.g., an ADR, which is solved by this one | next decision record, e.g., an ADR, which solves this one | … | pointer to more information]

## Links <!-- optional -->

- [Link type](link to adr) <!-- example: Refined by [xxx](yyyymmdd-xxx.md) -->
- … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
Loading