Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create critique by Hongbo.md #8

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create critique by Hongbo.md #8

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

fhbzc
Copy link

@fhbzc fhbzc commented Mar 1, 2021

Main content

bvasiles
bvasiles requested changes Mar 15, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner

@bvasiles bvasiles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, this reads as mechanical (answering the questions I listed to help with organization / structure, without much synthesis) and not the right style for a blog post. Take a look at Hana's for example.

posts/critique by Hongbo.md
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
** Description of problem **
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the title of your blog post? Who is the author of the blog post? What paper are you critiquing?

posts/critique by Hongbo.md

Weakness:

- The method is not complicated enough to provide a deep insight.
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As formulated, this is not a valid criticism. "Complicated" is undefined -- what does it mean for a method to be complicated and why isn't this one complicated enough? Why is being complicated necessary to provide deep insights?

bvasiles
bvasiles requested changes Mar 15, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner

@bvasiles bvasiles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also please use proper markdown formatting and please spell check the text (there are many grammatical and spelling issues)

posts/critique by Hongbo.md
** Critique **
* What's the authors' likely philosophical stance? *
I would think they are "Positivist", as they start from common-pool resource and voluntter-contribution theory and expect this theory can "predict" what's happening in oss.
* How well structured is the literature review? Is there a clear gap / hook? What are they? *
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Be explicit about the problem, gap, and hook. What are each of them in this study?

@bvasiles bvasiles self-assigned this Mar 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bvasiles bvasiles bvasiles requested changes

Assignees

@bvasiles bvasiles

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@fhbzc @bvasiles