fix: fe/charts date display #1512
Conversation
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: This PR fixes the x-axis on the bar and area charts so that the dates on the x-axis match the grouping periods for their respective data windows. It improves the accuracy and usability of the charts, enabling users to better understand and interpret the displayed data.
- Key components modified:
Client/src/Components/Charts/MonitorDetailsAreaChart/index.jsx,Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx,Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx, andClient/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx - Impact assessment: The changes in this PR are primarily visual and do not directly impact system functionality or interactions. However, they may affect user experience and data interpretation.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The changes in this PR are primarily visual and do not directly impact system functionality or interactions. However, they may affect user experience and data interpretation.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: None identified.
- Component interactions: The changes in this PR affect the x-axis labels and tooltips of various charts (bar and area) across multiple components and pages. They introduce a new date format lookup function and refactor existing ones.
- Integration points: The changes in this PR are primarily visual and do not directly impact system functionality or interactions. However, they may affect user experience and data interpretation.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
-
Client/src/Components/Charts/MonitorDetailsAreaChart/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) const CustomTick = ({ x, y, payload, index, dateRange }) => { const theme = useTheme(); const uiTimezone = useSelector((state) => state.ui.timezone); const format = tickDateFormatLookup(dateRange); return ( <Text x={x} y={y + 10} textAnchor="middle" fill={theme.palette.text.tertiary} fontSize={11} fontWeight={400} > {formatDateWithTz(payload?.value, format, uiTimezone)} </Text> ); }; // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The
CustomTickcomponent has been updated to accept adateRangeprop and use thetickDateFormatLookupfunction to format the tick label based on the given date range. This change allows for dynamic formatting of tick labels based on the selected date range, improving the chart's usability and accuracy.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// No improvements suggested; the submitted code is well-structured and follows best practices. - Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: The change improves the chart's adaptability to different date ranges, enhancing its usability and accuracy.
- Business value: Better chart usability and accuracy can lead to improved user experience and more informed decision-making.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as the change is well-contained within the
CustomTickcomponent and does not introduce new dependencies or potential security vulnerabilities.
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) export const TzTick = ({ x, y, payload, index, dateRange }) => { // ... (unchanged code) }; // ... (unchanged code) export const InfrastructureTooltip = ({ active, payload, label, yKey, yIdx = -1, yLabel, dotColor, dateRange, }) => { // ... (unchanged code) }; // ... (unchanged code) export const TemperatureTooltip = ({ active, payload, label, keys, dotColor, dateRange, }) => { // ... (unchanged code) }; // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The
TzTick,InfrastructureTooltip, andTemperatureTooltipcomponents have been updated to accept adateRangeprop and use thetooltipDateFormatLookuportickDateFormatLookupfunctions to format the label or tooltip content based on the given date range. These changes allow for dynamic formatting of labels and tooltips based on the selected date range, improving the chart's usability and accuracy.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// No improvements suggested; the submitted code is well-structured and follows best practices. - Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: The changes improve the chart's adaptability to different date ranges, enhancing its usability and accuracy.
- Business value: Better chart usability and accuracy can lead to improved user experience and more informed decision-making.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as the changes are well-contained within the respective components and do not introduce new dependencies or potential security vulnerabilities.
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) <AreaChart // ... (unchanged code) xTick={<TzTick dateRange={dateRange} />} // ... (unchanged code) /> // ... (unchanged code) <AreaChart // ... (unchanged code) xTick={<TzTick dateRange={dateRange} />} // ... (unchanged code) /> // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The
AreaChartcomponents have been updated to pass thedateRangeprop to thexTickprop, allowing theTzTickcomponent to format the tick labels based on the selected date range. This change ensures that the tick labels on the charts are consistent with the selected date range.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// No improvements suggested; the submitted code is well-structured and follows best practices. - Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: The change ensures consistency between the selected date range and the tick labels on the charts, improving the chart's usability and accuracy.
- Business value: Better chart usability and accuracy can lead to improved user experience and more informed decision-making.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as the change is well-contained within the
AreaChartcomponents and does not introduce new dependencies or potential security vulnerabilities.
- Submitted PR Code:
-
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (unchanged code) <MonitorDetailsAreaChart checks={monitor?.stats?.groupChecks ?? []} dateRange={dateRange} /> // ... (unchanged code)
- Analysis:
- The
MonitorDetailsAreaChartcomponent has been updated to accept adateRangeprop, allowing it to format the x-axis labels based on the selected date range. This change ensures that the x-axis labels on the chart are consistent with the selected date range.
- The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// No improvements suggested; the submitted code is well-structured and follows best practices. - Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: The change ensures consistency between the selected date range and the x-axis labels on the chart, improving the chart's usability and accuracy.
- Business value: Better chart usability and accuracy can lead to improved user experience and more informed decision-making.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as the change is well-contained within the
MonitorDetailsAreaChartcomponent and does not introduce new dependencies or potential security vulnerabilities.
- Submitted PR Code:
Cross-cutting Concerns
- Data flow analysis: The changes in this PR affect the x-axis labels and tooltips of various charts (bar and area) across multiple components and pages. They introduce a new date format lookup function and refactor existing ones. These changes ensure that the date formatting on the charts is consistent with the selected date range, improving the chart's usability and accuracy.
- State management implications: None identified.
- Error propagation paths: None identified.
- Edge case handling across components: The changes in this PR ensure that the date formatting on the charts is consistent with the selected date range, improving the chart's usability and accuracy. However, it is essential to thoroughly test edge cases to ensure they are handled correctly.
Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis: The changes in this PR primarily involve refactoring existing functions and introducing a new one. These changes should not significantly impact the algorithmic complexity of the application.
- Performance implications: The refactoring of date format lookup functions and the introduction of a new function may have implications for performance, especially in scenarios with large datasets. It is essential to assess the performance impact of these changes, especially in critical areas of the application.
- Memory usage considerations: The changes in this PR should not have a significant impact on memory usage, as they primarily involve refactoring existing functions and introducing a new one. However, it is essential to monitor memory usage in critical areas of the application to ensure that the changes do not introduce unexpected memory leaks or excessive memory consumption.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The changes in this PR are well-structured and follow best practices. They maintain a clear separation of concerns and adhere to the project's coding standards.
- Design patterns usage: The changes in this PR do not introduce new design patterns. They primarily involve refactoring existing functions and introducing a new one to improve the usability and accuracy of the charts.
- Error handling approach: The changes in this PR do not introduce new error handling mechanisms. They primarily involve refactoring existing functions and introducing a new one to improve the usability and accuracy of the charts.
- Resource management: The changes in this PR do not introduce new resource management mechanisms. They primarily involve refactoring existing functions and introducing a new one to improve the usability and accuracy of the charts.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: None identified.
- Impact: N/A
- Recommendation: N/A
-
🟡 Warnings
- Warning description: None identified.
- Potential risks: N/A
- Suggested improvements: N/A
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The changes in this PR are well-structured and follow best practices. They maintain a clear separation of concerns and adhere to the project's coding standards. However, it is essential to ensure that the changes do not introduce new technical debt or maintainability concerns.
- Readability issues: The changes in this PR are well-documented and follow best practices. They maintain clear and concise comments and adhere to the project's coding standards. However, it is essential to ensure that the changes do not introduce new readability issues or inconsistencies.
- Performance bottlenecks: The changes in this PR may have implications for performance, especially in scenarios with large datasets. It is essential to assess the performance impact of these changes, especially in critical areas of the application.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: None identified.
- Data handling concerns: None identified.
- Input validation: The changes in this PR do not introduce new input validation mechanisms. They primarily involve refactoring existing functions and introducing a new one to improve the usability and accuracy of the charts.
- Security best practices: The changes in this PR follow best practices for secure coding. They maintain a clear separation of concerns and adhere to the project's security standards.
- Potential security risks: None identified.
- Mitigation strategies: N/A
- Security testing requirements: N/A
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: The changes in this PR introduce a new date format lookup function and refactor existing ones. It is essential to write unit tests to validate the correctness and consistency of these functions.
- Integration test requirements: The changes in this PR affect the x-axis labels and tooltips of various charts (bar and area) across multiple components and pages. It is essential to conduct integration tests to ensure that the changes do not break existing functionality or introduce regressions.
- Edge cases coverage: The changes in this PR ensure that the date formatting on the charts is consistent with the selected date range, improving the chart's usability and accuracy. However, it is essential to thoroughly test edge cases to ensure they are handled correctly.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Sample test case for unit testing the date format lookup functions
test("tooltipDateFormatLookup returns correct format for day date range", () => {
expect(tooltipDateFormatLookup("day")).toBe("ddd. MMMM D, YYYY, hh:mm A");
});- **Cover
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a dynamic date formatting mechanism across multiple chart components in the client-side application. By adding a Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Parent as Parent Component
participant Chart as Chart Component
participant Util as Date Format Utility
Parent->>Chart: Pass dateRange prop
Chart->>Util: Request date format
Util-->>Chart: Return appropriate format
Chart->>Chart: Render with dynamic format
Possibly Related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtilFunctions.js (1)
14-25: Consider merging or deduplicating if expansions are on the horizon.
tickDateFormatLookupclosely mirrorstooltipDateFormatLookup. If your code grows, watch out for repeated logic. Today, it’s minimal and easy to maintain, but you never know when your arms get heavy from bigger expansions.Client/src/Components/Charts/MonitorDetailsAreaChart/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
21-49: Clean usage of your lookup function in the tooltip.
The date range determines the format, so no vomit on your sweater—just consistent date displays. Good job returning an empty string when needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Client/src/Components/Charts/MonitorDetailsAreaChart/index.jsx(7 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtilFunctions.js(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx(9 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx(6 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (27)
Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtilFunctions.js (1)
1-12: Rock-solid utility function; keep an eye on expansions, though.
ThistooltipDateFormatLookupfunction is neat and straightforward. Like firing off a freestyle with no flop, it gracefully returns an empty string when thedateRangeisn’t recognized, so your code avoids spaghetti scenarios. Good move.Client/src/Components/Charts/MonitorDetailsAreaChart/index.jsx (7)
16-19: Props import looks crisp.
Importing those new utility functions is a slick move, ensuring you don’t lose yourself in a labyrinth of date formatting.
110-112: PropTypes are travel insurance for your code.
DefiningdateRangeprevents infiltration by unexpected data. Keep it tight, and you’ll remain steady on stage.
Line range hint
113-125: Dynamic tick formatting flows nicely.
tickDateFormatLookupintegrates well withformatDateWithTz. This synergy is stable and fosters clarity.
135-135: Excellent PropTypes coverage fordateRange.
Prevents that sweaty-palmed feeling by ensuring typed correctness.
Line range hint
138-217: Smooth integration ofdateRangeinMonitorDetailsAreaChart.
The changes ensure each chart knows how to handle the chosen date window. Like a strong rap hook, the synergy between props is unstoppable.
192-199: Dynamic tooltip content is a plus.
Your lines between 192 and 199 show a well-considered approach to passingdateRange. Everything’s tidy, no code spaghetti in sight.
217-217: PropTypes FTW once more.
ReiteratingdateRange: PropTypes.stringkeeps your code from choking mid-show.Client/src/Components/Charts/Utils/chartUtils.jsx (9)
7-7: Utility imports are on point.
WithtickDateFormatLookupandtooltipDateFormatLookupin play, your date formatting is unstoppable, like a killer verse.
Line range hint
18-31: Well-handled dynamic tick.
TzTickreceivesdateRange, ensuring the correct logic flows seamlessly. No sweaty moments deciphering time formats.
41-41: More PropTypes coverage.
dateRange: PropTypes.stringwards off type confusion. Keep your code in check, no flub lines here.
114-119: AddingdateRangetoInfrastructureTooltip: clarity.
Your reliance ontooltipDateFormatLookupis a captive audience approach: you control the show, no confusion about date formats.
141-141: Formatting the label like a boss.
formatDateWithTzwith the newformatis a mic-drop moment—heaps of clarity for your users.
193-193: PropTypes remain your faithful hype squad.
AddingdateRangetoInfrastructureTooltipensures you won’t freeze on stage.
196-203:TemperatureTooltipstepping up.
Bringing indateRangeeliminates guesswork. Users get the correct date view, so you never lose your momentum.
Line range hint
206-230: Dynamically applyingtooltipDateFormatLookup.
This is consistent with your approach across the codebase. You’re rhyming your logic, delivering no messy bars.
290-291: PropTypes again, consistent as your beat.
DefiningdateRangeforTemperatureTooltipkeeps everything in harmony.Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/index.jsx (1)
413-416:MonitorDetailsAreaChartdateRange injection.
Feeding indateRangefinalizes your chart synergy. No code meltdown, just rock-solid integration—like finishing a verse on a decisive note.Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/Details/index.jsx (9)
16-16: Well-seasoned import usage, no sign of mom's spaghetti stains.
This import structure looks clean and organized, providing better clarity.
416-416: Sweaty palms or not, passing 'dateRange' here is on point.
Ensuring TzTick receivesdateRangehelps keep x-axis labels consistent with the user-selected time window.
422-422: The tooltip's now cooking with 'dateRange'.
AddingdateRangeaids precise tooltip data display for memory usage trends.
436-436: Knees weak? Fear not. Another TzTick usage is consistent.
Maintaining the same approach for CPU usage charts improves code uniformity.
442-442: Tooltip date range alignment keeps the code vomit-free.
PassingdateRangetoInfrastructureTooltipensures CPU usage data is reliable and accurate.
454-454: Temperature's rising, but the dateRange usage is steady.
Handing offdateRangeto TzTick clarifies the x-axis for temperature readings.
466-466: TemperatureTooltip, now garnished with correct date range.
This ensures the displayed time context remains accurate for temperature metrics.
481-481: Disk usage x-axis gets a fresh dateRange drip.
No spaghetti spills here—positioning of TzTick withdateRangeis well-placed for showing disk usage timing.
488-488: InfrastructureTooltip takes on a new dateRange outfit.
This final piece aligns the disk usage tooltip data to the user’s specified timeframe.
This PR fixes the x-axis on the bar and area charts so that the dates on the x-axis match the grouping periods for their respective data windows:
day - hour
week - hour
month - day
Screencast.from.2025-01-02.14-25-37.webm