Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: integrate sd-jwt #657

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: integrate sd-jwt #657

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

SinanovicEdis
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 31dfdc8

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@SinanovicEdis SinanovicEdis changed the title Integrate SD-JWT feat: integrate sd-jwt Dec 18, 2024
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 23, 2024

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 31dfdc8.

Command Status Duration Result
nx test:ci @blockchain-lab-um/masca ❌ Failed 1m 30s View ↗
nx test:ci @blockchain-lab-um/extended-verifica... ✅ Succeeded 24s View ↗
nx test:ci @blockchain-lab-um/did-provider-key ✅ Succeeded 9s View ↗
nx test:ci @blockchain-lab-um/veramo-datamanager ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-01-28 11:06:13 UTC

@SinanovicEdis SinanovicEdis self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
@SinanovicEdis SinanovicEdis marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 16:26
Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed for 'blockchain-lab-um_did-provider-key'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants