Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Optimize streaming processing and history #435

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 29, 2024

Conversation

mykola-mokhnach
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2024 15:01
@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach requested a review from eglitise June 28, 2024 18:19
@@ -170,31 +153,6 @@ class SubProcess extends EventEmitter {

// emit the actual output for whomever's listening
this.emit('output', stdout, stderr);

// we also want to emit lines, but it's more complex since output
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so we just don't need this logic anymore? how come?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach Jun 28, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's still there, just based on a different foundation to save CPU and memory. Tests remain unchanged and the logic is preserved

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach merged commit b63798e into appium:main Jun 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach deleted the buffer branch June 29, 2024 09:46
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2024
## [2.1.7](v2.1.6...v2.1.7) (2024-06-29)

### Miscellaneous Chores

* Optimize streaming processing and history ([#435](#435)) ([b63798e](b63798e))
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.1.7 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants