Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #44 from retokromer/patch-1
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
fix nits
  • Loading branch information
Ethan Gates authored May 28, 2019
2 parents c8f7592 + 9656ee0 commit 755b2fe
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ <h3><a href="pinouts.html#scart">S-Video SCART</a></h3>
<!-- start Analog Y/C-688 protocol cables -->
<div class="well">
<h4 id="yc-688">Y/C-688 ("Dub")</h4>
<p>An earlier protocol that, like S-Video (which came later but was more common), split video into two components, luminance (Y) and chrominance (C). Intended to improve the quality of direct tape duplication from one video deck to another, this connection was often vaguely labeled/referred to simply as "dub". First seen on 3/4" Umatic decks, but continued to be used on professional Betacam and VHS/S-VHS decks. Though the same cables and pinouts were usually used, different Y/C-688-capable decks and devices modulated the chrominance signal at different frequencies - making Y/C-688 signal incompatible with S-Video devices (or sometimes even from one Y/C-688-capable deck to another)! Also incompatible with an implementation of Y′P<sub>B</sub>P<sub>R</sub> video that used the same connector and was *also* simply labeled "dub" (see above).</p>
<p>An earlier protocol that, like S-Video (which came later but was more common), split video into two components, luminance (Y) and chrominance (C). Intended to improve the quality of direct tape duplication from one video deck to another, this connection was often vaguely labeled/referred to simply as "dub". First seen on 3/4" U-matic decks, but continued to be used on professional Betacam and VHS/S-VHS decks. Though the same cables and pinouts were usually used, different Y/C-688-capable decks and devices modulated the chrominance signal at different frequencies - making Y/C-688 signal incompatible with S-Video devices (or sometimes even from one Y/C-688-capable deck to another)! Also incompatible with an implementation of Y′P<sub>B</sub>P<sub>R</sub> video that used the same connector and was *also* simply labeled "dub" (see above).</p>
<p><b>Introduced:</b>unknown</p>
<p><b>Max resolution:</b> Unknown</p>
<p><b>Connectors:</b></p>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ <h3><a href="pinouts.html#xlr">Balanced XLR</a></h3>
<img src="images/Audio/xlr_cork_port.jpg" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" title="http://jp.music-group.com/TCE/CR/StudioKonnekt48/images/main_out_xlr_large.jpg">
<img src="images/Audio/xlr_bottle_port.jpg" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" title="http://proaudioblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/XLR-Input.jpg">
</div>
<p>A three-pin connector favored for long balanced cables in pro audio equipment. Tradionally, analog XLR audio connectors had an electrical impedance of 75 ohms (75 Ω). Digital audio signals using the XLR connector required a higher impedance (110 Ω), but this would have no effect on analog signals - therefore, 110 Ω XLR cables intended for digital audio can safely be used for balanced analog audio connections as well. See <a href="#aes-3">AES-3</a>.</p>
<p>A three-pin connector favored for long balanced cables in pro audio equipment. Traditionally, analog XLR audio connectors had an electrical impedance of 75 ohms (75 Ω). Digital audio signals using the XLR connector required a higher impedance (110 Ω), but this would have no effect on analog signals - therefore, 110 Ω XLR cables intended for digital audio can safely be used for balanced analog audio connections as well. See <a href="#aes-3">AES-3</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ <h3><a href="pinouts.html#usb-3.0">USB 3.0 Type A</a></h3>
<img src="images/Data/USB3_typeA_bottle1.jpg" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" title="http://icdn8.digitaltrends.com/image/usb-3-0-ports-625x300-c.jpg">
<img src="images/Data/USB3_typeA_bottle2.jpg" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="bottom" title="http://www.howtogeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/650x434xusb-2.0-vs-usb-3.0-blue-port.jpg.pagespeed.gp+jp+jw+pj+js+rj+rp+rw+ri+cp+md.ic.Hw2qDXl-UA.jpg">
</div>
<p>Similar in sixe, shape, appearance to USB 2.0 Type A, though it has additional pins. Typically colored blue to differentiate from USB 2.0 Type A connections.</p>
<p>Similar in size, shape, appearance to USB 2.0 Type A, though it has additional pins. Typically colored blue to differentiate from USB 2.0 Type A connections.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 755b2fe

Please sign in to comment.