test: rpc: add last block announcement time to getpeerinfo result #9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Copy its value from CNodeState. Unused until the next commit.
adamjonas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
…BlockTx suppression fa9dc92 test: Add missing CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlockTx suppression (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Fixes bitcoin#28865 (comment) ``` # FUZZ=policy_estimator UBSAN_OPTIONS="suppressions=/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1" ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz /tmp/crash-154b42214e70781a9c1ad72d3f2693913dcf8c06 ... policy/fees.cpp:632:27: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'unsigned int' of value 4294574080 (32-bit, unsigned) to type 'int' changed the value to -393216 (32-bit, signed) #0 0x55cbbe10daee in CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlockTx(unsigned int, CTxMemPoolEntry const*) src/policy/fees.cpp:632:27 bitcoin#1 0x55cbbe10e361 in CBlockPolicyEstimator::processBlock(unsigned int, std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry const*, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry const*>>&) src/policy/fees.cpp:680:13 #2 0x55cbbd84af48 in policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1::operator()() const src/test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:69:40 #3 0x55cbbd84af48 in unsigned long CallOneOf<policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_0, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_2, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_3>(FuzzedDataProvider&, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_0, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_2, policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_3) src/./test/fuzz/util.h:43:27 #4 0x55cbbd84af48 in policy_estimator_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>) src/test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:38:9 #5 0x55cbbda1cc18 in std::function<void (Span<unsigned char const>)>::operator()(Span<unsigned char const>) const /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/std_function.h:591:9 #6 0x55cbbda1cc18 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp:178:5 #7 0x55cbbd26a944 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x190e944) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) #8 0x55cbbd253916 in fuzzer::RunOneTest(fuzzer::Fuzzer*, char const*, unsigned long) (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x18f7916) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) #9 0x55cbbd25945a in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x18fd45a) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) #10 0x55cbbd284026 in main (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x1928026) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) #11 0x7fe4aa8280cf (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x280cf) (BuildId: 96ab1a8f3b2c9a2ed37c7388615e6a726d037e89) #12 0x7fe4aa828188 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x28188) (BuildId: 96ab1a8f3b2c9a2ed37c7388615e6a726d037e89) #13 0x55cbbd24e494 in _start (/root/fuzz_dir/scratch/fuzz_gen/code/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x18f2494) (BuildId: ffb89e0b86c093ca3bdeae6f85537737a4e3b42d) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: implicit-integer-sign-change policy/fees.cpp:632:27 in ``` ``` # base64 /tmp/crash-154b42214e70781a9c1ad72d3f2693913dcf8c06 AQEAAAAAADkFlVwAAQEAAAAAADkFlZVcACTDSSsP3746IAZrH48khwMAAQEB/QEALQAACwAAAAAA FgAAAAAAAQAABgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACcQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD6AAAAOQWVXAABAQAA AAAAOQWVlVwAIMNJKw/fvjogBmsfjySHAwABAQH9AQAtAAALAAAAAAAAAAABAAAGAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAJxAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPr/AAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAA/wAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAA AAEBAeAIAVwBXAAA/jbSBvwBKABSKBwBYgEB2wAEkvXInHYAAAAAAAAAvgAAAAAA/9//6v8e/xIk MgAlAiUAOw== ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK fa9dc92 dergoegge: utACK fa9dc92 Tree-SHA512: 3898c17c928ecc2bcc8c7086359e9ae00da2197b4d8e10c7bf6d12415326c9bca3ef6e1d8d3b83172ccfa604ce7e7371415262ba705225f9ea4da8b1a7eb0306
adamjonas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
…tifications fuzz target fab164f fuzz: Avoid signed-integer-overflow in wallet_notifications fuzz target (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Should avoid ``` policy/feerate.cpp:29:63: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 77600710321911316 * 149 cannot be represented in type 'int64_t' (aka 'long') #0 0x563a1775ed66 in CFeeRate::GetFee(unsigned int) const src/policy/feerate.cpp:29:63 bitcoin#1 0x563a15913a69 in wallet::COutput::COutput(COutPoint const&, CTxOut const&, int, int, bool, bool, bool, long, bool, std::optional<CFeeRate>) src/./wallet/coinselection.h:91:57 #2 0x563a16fa6a6d in wallet::FetchSelectedInputs(wallet::CWallet const&, wallet::CCoinControl const&, wallet::CoinSelectionParams const&) src/wallet/spend.cpp:297:17 #3 0x563a16fc4512 in wallet::CreateTransactionInternal(wallet::CWallet&, std::vector<wallet::CRecipient, std::allocator<wallet::CRecipient>> const&, int, wallet::CCoinControl const&, bool) src/wallet/spend.cpp:1105:33 #4 0x563a16fbec74 in wallet::CreateTransaction(wallet::CWallet&, std::vector<wallet::CRecipient, std::allocator<wallet::CRecipient>> const&, int, wallet::CCoinControl const&, bool) src/wallet/spend.cpp:1291:16 #5 0x563a16fcf6df in wallet::FundTransaction(wallet::CWallet&, CMutableTransaction&, long&, int&, bilingual_str&, bool, std::set<int, std::less<int>, std::allocator<int>> const&, wallet::CCoinControl) src/wallet/spend.cpp:1361:16 #6 0x563a1597b7b9 in wallet::(anonymous namespace)::FuzzedWallet::FundTx(FuzzedDataProvider&, CMutableTransaction) src/wallet/test/fuzz/notifications.cpp:162:15 #7 0x563a15958240 in wallet::(anonymous namespace)::wallet_notifications_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_0::operator()() const src/wallet/test/fuzz/notifications.cpp:228:23 #8 0x563a15958240 in unsigned long CallOneOf<wallet::(anonymous namespace)::wallet_notifications_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_0, wallet::(anonymous namespace)::wallet_notifications_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1>(FuzzedDataProvider&, wallet::(anonymous namespace)::wallet_notifications_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_0, wallet::(anonymous namespace)::wallet_notifications_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>)::$_1) src/./test/fuzz/util.h:43:27 #9 0x563a15958240 in wallet::(anonymous namespace)::wallet_notifications_fuzz_target(Span<unsigned char const>) src/wallet/test/fuzz/notifications.cpp:196:9 #10 0x563a15fdef0c in std::function<void (Span<unsigned char const>)>::operator()(Span<unsigned char const>) const /usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/std_function.h:591:9 #11 0x563a15fdef0c in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput src/test/fuzz/fuzz.cpp:178:5 #12 0x563a158032a4 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long) (/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x19822a4) (BuildId: 8acb42ad599d7f6d25b6f93e18fd564d80df7c06) #13 0x563a15802999 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::RunOne(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, bool, fuzzer::InputInfo*, bool, bool*) (/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x1981999) (BuildId: 8acb42ad599d7f6d25b6f93e18fd564d80df7c06) #14 0x563a15804586 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ReadAndExecuteSeedCorpora(std::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, std::allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile>>&) (/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x1983586) (BuildId: 8acb42ad599d7f6d25b6f93e18fd564d80df7c06) #15 0x563a15804aa7 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::Loop(std::vector<fuzzer::SizedFile, std::allocator<fuzzer::SizedFile>>&) (/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x1983aa7) (BuildId: 8acb42ad599d7f6d25b6f93e18fd564d80df7c06) #16 0x563a157f21fb in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)) (/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x19711fb) (BuildId: 8acb42ad599d7f6d25b6f93e18fd564d80df7c06) #17 0x563a1581c766 in main (/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x199b766) (BuildId: 8acb42ad599d7f6d25b6f93e18fd564d80df7c06) bitcoin#18 0x7f499e17b0cf (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x280cf) (BuildId: 96ab1a8f3b2c9a2ed37c7388615e6a726d037e89) bitcoin#19 0x7f499e17b188 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x28188) (BuildId: 96ab1a8f3b2c9a2ed37c7388615e6a726d037e89) bitcoin#20 0x563a157e70c4 in _start (/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/test/fuzz/fuzz+0x19660c4) (BuildId: 8acb42ad599d7f6d25b6f93e18fd564d80df7c06) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: signed-integer-overflow policy/feerate.cpp:29:63 in MS: 0 ; base unit: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0x3f,0x0,0x2f,0x5f,0x5f,0x5f,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0x7d,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0x53,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x13,0x5e,0x5f,0x5f,0x8,0x25,0x0,0x5f,0x5f,0x5f,0x5f,0x5f,0x5f,0x8,0x25,0xca,0x7f,0x5f,0x5f,0x5f,0x13,0x13,0x5f,0x5f,0x5f,0x2,0xdb,0xca,0x0,0x0,0xe7,0xe6,0x66,0x65,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x0,0x44,0x3f,0xa,0xa,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff,0x61,0x76,0x6f,0x69,0x0,0xb5,0x15, ?\000/___}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}\377\377\377\377\377S\377\377\377\377\377\000\000\000\000\000\000\023^__\010%\000______\010%\312\177___\023\023___\002\333\312\000\000\347\346fe\000\000\000\000D?\012\012\377\377\377\377\377avoi\000\265\025 artifact_prefix='./'; Test unit written to ./crash-4d3bac8a64d4e58b2f0943e6d28e6e1f16328d7d Base64: PwAvX19ffX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX3//////1P//////wAAAAAAABNeX18IJQBfX19fX18IJcp/X19fExNfX18C28oAAOfmZmUAAAAARD8KCv//////YXZvaQC1FQ== ACKs for top commit: dergoegge: ACK fab164f brunoerg: ACK fab164f Tree-SHA512: f416828f4394aa7303ee437f141e9bbd23c0e0f1b830e4ef3932338858249ba68a811b9837c5b7ad8c6ab871b6354996434183597c1a910a8d8e8d829693e4b2
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds
last_block_announcementto the per-peergetpeerinfoRPC result. This is the most recent time that this peer was the first to notify our node of a new block (one that we didn't already know about), or zero if this peer has never been the first to notify us of a new block. This timestamp already exists internally and is used for stale-tip eviction logic; this PR exposes it at the RPC layer.This PR started out as a suggestion for additional test coverage, see bitcoin#26172 (comment). It turned out that the easiest way to test (already-merged) bitcoin#26172 is to add this field to
getpeerinfoand have a functional test verify its value. But it may also be useful to have this result in its own right, similar to that RPC's existinglast_blockfield -- it indicates something about the quality of our peers. It allows one to predict which peer will be evicted when the stale tip logic activates. (I'm not sure if that would be useful, but it may be.)The functional test added here fails without bitcoin#26172, which is the main goal.
This PR does not test the actual stale-tip eviction logic; that's difficult to do with a functional test. But it does test the correctness of the timestamp that the eviction logic depends on. bitcoin#23352 is an attempt to test the eviction logic using a unit test, it's not ready to be merged yet. I think having both kinds of tests would be beneficial.