Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DO NOT MERGE: Supports setting PHY for extended range #223

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mharper
Copy link
Contributor

@mharper mharper commented Jan 30, 2019

Adds setPhy/getPhy for setting PHY. On nRF52840, allows setting PHY
to BLE_GAP_PHY_CODED to support extended range.

This work compiles but is not yet field-tested.

Implements #82.

Adds `setPhy`/`getPhy` for setting PHY. On nRF52840, allows setting PHY
to `BLE_GAP_PHY_CODED` to support extended range.

This work compiles but is not yet field-tested.
@hathach
Copy link
Member

hathach commented Jan 30, 2019

thanks for your addition. I remembered we need to handle PHY event, and response to PHY request etc.. but this is a good start.

@MGK10
Copy link

MGK10 commented Feb 13, 2019

@mharper did you field-tested it yet? Did it work?

@mharper
Copy link
Contributor Author

mharper commented Feb 13, 2019

Not yet. Being able to crank up the tx power to +8dBm obviated the immediate need for extended range in my project.

@czuvich
Copy link

czuvich commented May 26, 2019

Just curious, is there going to be support for this?

@hathach
Copy link
Member

hathach commented May 26, 2019

There is, question is when since there is tons of other pending issues 😅😅

@hathach
Copy link
Member

hathach commented Aug 17, 2019

implemented by PR #324

@hathach hathach closed this Aug 17, 2019
@tilink tilink mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2020
@hathach
Copy link
Member

hathach commented Apr 19, 2020

reopen since it is closed by mistake

@hathach hathach reopened this Apr 19, 2020
@hathach hathach marked this pull request as draft August 4, 2020 07:56
@gernot1972
Copy link

Is it possible to switch to coded PHY now?

@bfribush
Copy link

Is Coded PHY possible now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants