-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No fs format nor file recreation and boot reason changes #656
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
ff8498e
to
4b911bf
Compare
Add getResetReason for rp2040/2350 (needs latest earle core) |
86121f1
to
3fc98a2
Compare
bootFile.flush(); | ||
bootFile.close(); | ||
is_success = true; | ||
} else { | ||
bootFile.close(); | ||
WS_DEBUG_PRINTLN("ERROR: Unable to open wipper_boot_out.txt for writing!"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't think we'll see this except in debug builds with Tx monitored. The next PR (#655) will resolve this.
@brentru this is ready for review |
if (!initFilesystem() && !initFilesystem(true)) { | ||
setStatusLEDColor(RED); | ||
fsHalt("ERROR Initializing Filesystem"); | ||
if (!initFilesystem()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am confused about tracing the brownout detection throughout the FS
class.
Could you help clarify the following:
- I see
brownOutCausedReset
is set withinget_and_print_reset_reason_for_cpu()
. - When does this function get called within FS? I don't see any calls outwards to this function, only the boolean
brownOutCausedReset
which isn't a function
delay(10); // let power stablise after failure | ||
if (!initFilesystem()) { | ||
// no lights, save power as we're probably on a low battery | ||
fsHalt("Brownout detected. Couldn't initialise filesystem."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please add some descriptive text/instructions on what to do if we couldn't recreate the FS after a brownout?
// no lights, save power as we're probably on a low battery | ||
fsHalt("Brownout detected. Couldn't initialise filesystem."); | ||
} | ||
} else if (!WS.brownOutCausedReset && !initFilesystem(true)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If a brownout was detected, all the handling for this was performed inside the if
condition above and we don't need to work with/handle it anymore.
Consider changing this to an if
and only handle the initFileSystem(true
case.
while (1) | ||
{ | ||
delay(1000); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great, I like the idea of resetting instead of instructing the user to reset!
Shorten this by doing:
for (;;) delay(1000);
// If WipperSnapper was previously installed - remove the | ||
// wippersnapper_boot_out.txt file | ||
eraseBootFile(); | ||
// Also, should probably relabel drive to WIPPER if CIRCUITPY was there |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be possible to do this within eraseCPFS
, as the vlume was likely named CIRCUITPY?
|
||
// Create wippersnapper_boot_out.txt file | ||
if (!createBootFile()) | ||
if (!createBootFile() && !WS.brownOutCausedReset) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to check if a brownout happened here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still check the bootlog contents in createBootfile, and print if there is a discrepency. In the event of a failure to write bootlog, assuming the secrets are still valid, we don't want to call it a failure by returning false
bootFile.print("ESP32 Core Version: "); | ||
bootFile.println(ESP.getCoreVersion()); | ||
#endif | ||
if (WS.brownOutCausedReset){ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we checking for a brownout here, again?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We wanted to inform that the bootlog isn't correct but we can't update it. I guess I could return true instead, or comment this as to why
@@ -349,6 +397,8 @@ void Wippersnapper_FS::createSecretsFile() { | |||
"Please edit it to reflect your Adafruit IO and network credentials. " | |||
"When you're done, press RESET on the board."); | |||
#endif | |||
delay(500); // previously 2500 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we decreasing this delay? It was from TinyUSB Arduino
@@ -349,6 +397,8 @@ void Wippersnapper_FS::createSecretsFile() { | |||
"Please edit it to reflect your Adafruit IO and network credentials. " | |||
"When you're done, press RESET on the board."); | |||
#endif | |||
delay(500); // previously 2500 | |||
initUSBMSC(); // re-init USB MSC to show new file to user for editing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Where did we detach USB MSC?
- Is this called twice? We shouldn't be.
- Do we call this again, outside of this function, after this is called?
if (error) { | ||
if (error == DeserializationError::EmptyInput) | ||
{ | ||
if (WS.brownOutCausedReset) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A special case to handle the brownout detection shouldn't be located here.
We should only handle the brownout detection/errors within the class constructor/init.
Recreation Steps: Secondly pull this repository (and read the readme) https://github.com/tyeth/python_nordic_ppk2_wipper_secrets_brownout |
Note - I will have more bandwidth to reproduce and trace this error after November, we'll re-look into it then. |
2f1cce7
to
3403744
Compare
This resolves a couple of things.
Firstly we now reattach USB Mass Storage Device after recreating the filesystem, this means that the drive now shows up on first boot after an initial firmware installation (tested with erased device). Previously the first boot would not show a drive, but subsequent boots would.
Secondly, in relation to brown-out situations, we now avoid erasing files unnecessarily, and if we last reset due to brownout we do not attempt to write any files like boot log nor erase the circuitpython files. There turns out to be little reason to write to the filesystem every boot. Mostly a load of
.exists
guards to avoid unnecessary erases, and checking the boot reason for some operations.There's a minor tweak to the print_reset_reason method as it was being used incorrectly. It was being passed CPU core number instead of passing in the result of rtc_get_reset_reason(cpuCore).
Finally the pico now has a boot reason adding in the latest Earle core, so included that too.