Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the ability to consider reactions #1086

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gorzelinski
Copy link

Description:
As mentioned in #861 (comment), in some projects it’s useful to track reactions as activity. This PR adds such an option (disabled by default). We tested it on our primary and supporting repositories, and it works as expected.

Related issue:
#861

Check list:

  • Mark if documentation changes are required.
  • Mark if tests were added or updated to cover the changes.

@gorzelinski gorzelinski requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2023 08:47
@dsame dsame self-assigned this Sep 6, 2023
@dsame
Copy link
Contributor

dsame commented Sep 6, 2023

Hello @gorzelinski , we started to review the PR, but can you please meanwhile fix the failed checks of the PR?

@gorzelinski
Copy link
Author

Hey @dsame, sure, I'll look into it ASAP.

@gorzelinski gorzelinski closed this Sep 6, 2023
@gorzelinski gorzelinski reopened this Sep 6, 2023
@dsame dsame linked an issue Sep 13, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@dsame dsame added the feature request New feature or request to improve the current logic label Sep 13, 2023
@gorzelinski
Copy link
Author

Should I do something more? As I see, the checks are passing now.

@nitrocode
Copy link

cc: @gorzelinski thanks for contributing this!

cc: @marko-zivic-93 @MaksimZhukov @dusan-trickovic friendly ping. Please review when you folks get a chance. This will help a lot more issues stay active that are being reacted to. Thank you for maintaining this action for us!

@gorzelinski
Copy link
Author

Hey @nitrocode, do we need additional reviews? Sorry for bothering you, but avoiding merge conflicts would be great.

@nitrocode
Copy link

Hi @gorzelinski , I do not manage this repo. I was just trying to get this reviewed so we can eventually get it merged.

I can see from past merges that each merge seemed to require at least 2 approvals before merging

https://github.com/actions/stale/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Amerged+-author%3Aapp%2Fdependabot+

@gorzelinski
Copy link
Author

@nitrocode Oh, I didn't know. Thanks for the info anyway.
So maybe I'll forward it to @dsame.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request to improve the current logic
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issues should be kept active if reactions (ie upvotes) or backlinks
3 participants