Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
docs: use therefore
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
alestiago committed Oct 18, 2023
1 parent c02e0b4 commit a747d36
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion site/docs/commands/check_licenses.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ very_good packages check licenses --ignore-retrieval-failures

## Supported licenses 💳

The license detection is processed by [Dart's package analyzer](https://pub.dev/packages/pana), which reports commonly found licenses (SPDX licenses). Hence, when specifying a license within arguments it must strictly match with the SPDX license name. The list of accepted licenses can be seen in the [SPDX GitHub repository](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/main/text) or in the [SPDX License enumeration](https://github.com/VeryGoodOpenSource/very_good_cli/blob/main/lib/src/pub_license/spdx_license.gen.dart).
The license detection is processed by [Dart's package analyzer](https://pub.dev/packages/pana), which reports commonly found licenses (SPDX licenses). The list of accepted licenses can be seen in the [SPDX GitHub repository](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/tree/main/text) or in the [SPDX License enumeration](https://github.com/VeryGoodOpenSource/very_good_cli/blob/main/lib/src/pub_license/spdx_license.gen.dart). Therefore, when specifying a license within arguments it must strictly match with the SPDX license name.

If a license file is incorrectly formatted or is not a commonly found license, then it might be reported as `unknown`. If the former is true, we suggest notifying the package maintainer about the issue.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit a747d36

Please sign in to comment.