-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CVE TEST #53306
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
CVE TEST #53306
Conversation
Signed-off-by: andyziye <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyziye <[email protected]>
} | ||
} | ||
return filedToMetricsMode; | ||
|
||
} | ||
|
||
@Override |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The most risky bug in this code is:
The filedToMetricsMode
map uses incorrect spelling for its variable name, which may lead to confusion and errors elsewhere in the code if it is referenced incorrectly as fieldToMetricsMode
.
You can modify the code like this:
Map<String, MetricsModes.MetricsMode> fieldToMetricsMode = Maps.newHashMap();
for (Types.NestedField field : table.getNativeTable().schema().columns()) {
MetricsModes.MetricsMode mode = metricsConf.columnMode(field.name());
// To reduce printing, only print specific metrics that are not in the
// DEFAULT_WRITE_METRICS_MODE_DEFAULT: truncate(16) mode
if (!mode.equals(defaultMode)) {
fieldToMetricsMode.put(field.name(), mode);
}
}
return fieldToMetricsMode;
[BE Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
Signed-off-by: andyziye <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: andyziye <[email protected]>
[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
[FE Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
Why I'm doing:
What I'm doing:
Fixes #issue
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check: