Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix bug with contingencies defined only in some periods/scenarios #46

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

Fix bug with contingencies defined only in some periods/scenarios #46

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Commits on May 22, 2024

  1. Update date in MATPOWER software citation.

    @rdzman
    rdzman committed May 22, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    9a7d9d4 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. Fix #45 where most does not properly handle cases with contingencies … 

    …defined only in some periods/scenarios.

- Check all periods/scenarios for contab before turning off contingencies when most.security_constrainted = -1
- Remove requirement for mdi.cont(1,1).contab to be non-empty when most.security_constrained = 1
- Update most_summary() to skip display of non-existent contingencies.
    @rdzman
    rdzman committed May 22, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    7f616a4 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on May 29, 2024

  1. Update CHANGES, Appendix B, add "Thanks to Stefano" ;-)

    @rdzman
    rdzman committed May 29, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    e05d571 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history