Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding downstream accuracy CCL params #64

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Adding downstream accuracy CCL params #64

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

fjaviersanchez
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR addresses #56, and adds the ability to pass along CCL accuracy parameters through augur. I still have to check whether these are passed downstream to firecrown (I suspect so, but not 100% sure).

@arthurmloureiro
Copy link
Collaborator

@fjaviersanchez do we know if these are passed to Firecrown?

@fjaviersanchez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No. Not for sure. I need confirmation from @marcpaterno and/or @vitenti .

@fjaviersanchez
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I am suspecting that since it will be in the same session of ccl it won't change those values, but can't tell if that's always the case.

@arthurmloureiro
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we also this into Analyse in case a likelihood is passed.

I am working on #60 to make that easier for the user. I think eventually we will shift towards only using pre-made firecrown likelihoods as this allows us make use of firecrown's .get_data_vector() method and similar stuff.

Copy link
Collaborator

@arthurmloureiro arthurmloureiro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great! I think maybe in the future we could try to parse the ccl information in a separate function/class or simply see how we pass that to firecrown entirely :D

@arthurmloureiro arthurmloureiro merged commit bd2c6e0 into master Jul 9, 2024
1 check passed
@arthurmloureiro arthurmloureiro deleted the issues/56 branch July 9, 2024 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants