-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
마이페이지, 메인페이지 CRUD 페이지 추가 #59
Conversation
Entity 연관관계 정보추가
docker-compose.yml
Outdated
@@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ services: | |||
# db-read: | |||
# image: younglong/pg-washpedia:latest | |||
# volumes: | |||
# - postgreEditDB:/var/lib/postgresql/data | |||
# - ./postgreEditDB:/var/lib/postgresql/data | |||
# environment: | |||
# POSTGRES_DB: read_db | |||
# POSTGRES_USER: ${{ secrets.PROJECT_USER }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the code patch you provided, here are some observations and suggestions for improvement:
-
In the
batch
service definition, you have commented out theimage
line and added a new line with${IMAGE}
. If you intend to use an environment variable as the image name, make sure that the${IMAGE}
variable is properly defined and set before using it in thedocker-compose.yml
file. -
In the
batch
service definition, you changed the port mapping from"8082:8080"
to"8082:8082"
. Make sure this change aligns with the configuration inside the Docker container. If the container is listening on port 8080, then the previous mapping was correct. If it's actually listening on port 8082, then this change is appropriate. -
In the
db-read
service definition, you changed the volume mapping frompostgreEditDB:/var/lib/postgresql/data
to./postgreEditDB:/var/lib/postgresql/data
. Make sure that thepostgreEditDB
volume is properly defined and exists, or alternatively, replace it with a valid local directory path on your host machine.
Overall, without the full context of the Dockerfile, complete docker-compose.yml
file, and any related scripts or dependencies, it's difficult to identify potential bugs or suggest further improvements. However, the points mentioned above should be considered and verified in your specific environment.
module-api/build.gradle
Outdated
// test - fixture Monkey | ||
testImplementation 'net.jqwik:jqwik:1.7.3' | ||
testImplementation("com.navercorp.fixturemonkey:fixture-monkey-starter:1.0.0") | ||
testImplementation("com.navercorp.fixturemonkey:fixture-monkey-jakarta-validation:1.0.0") | ||
} | ||
|
||
tasks.named('test') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, the code patch seems to include additions to the project dependencies. Here are some observations and suggestions:
-
Validataion: The line
implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-validation:2.7.4'
adds the Spring Boot Starter Validation library for validating input data. This seems fine if you need validation support in your application. -
Test Dependencies: The lines starting with
testImplementation
add test dependencies. Including the Spring Boot Starter Test and Spring Security Test is common practice for testing Spring applications. Additionally, two new dependencies are added:testImplementation 'net.jqwik:jqwik:1.7.3'
adds the jqwik library for property-based testing.testImplementation("com.navercorp.fixturemonkey:fixture-monkey-starter:1.0.0")
andtestImplementation("com.navercorp.fixturemonkey:fixture-monkey-jakarta-validation:1.0.0")
add the FixtureMonkey libraries for generating test data and handling Jakarta Validation annotations.
Improvement Suggestions:
- It's generally a good practice to specify the version of Spring Boot used throughout the project, including the main dependencies mentioned above (Spring Boot Starter Validation, Spring Boot Starter Test, Spring Security Test).
- Make sure that the versions provided (
2.7.4
,1.7.3
, and1.0.0
) are the latest stable versions available at the time you're using them, as newer versions may provide bug fixes and improvements.
For a more thorough review, additional context about the project and its requirements would be helpful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
이전 PR 에서 봤던 변경점도 같이 올라온 것 같은데, 이전 PR을 merge 하시고 합친 다음에 다시 올리시면 좋을 거 같습니다.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
이전 PR에 포함되었던 커밋도 현재 PR에 함께 포함되어 있어 변경점을 확인하기 어렵습니다.
이전에 올리셨던 PR을 머지시키고 난 뒤에 합쳐서 올려주시면 좋겠어요. 커밋 로그를 통해서 변경점들은 확인하였습니다.
@RestController | ||
public class MainContoller { | ||
@GetMapping("") | ||
ResponseEntity<String> mainPage(){ | ||
return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.OK).body("main page입니다."); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
커밋 새로해서 push 한 것에 반영되었습니다. pull 받는걸 깜빡하고 바로 올렸나 봅니다~ ㅠㅠ
String bannerImageUrl = "http://localhost:8080/bannersample.png"; | ||
String suggestImageUrl = "http://localhost:8080/suggestsample.png"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍🏻
@OneToOne | ||
@JoinColumn(name = "member_no", nullable = false) | ||
private Member memberNo; | ||
private Member member; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✔️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
flyway -> alter column 파일만 추가 반영해주세요~
(제가 #61 PR로 올렸습니다!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Controller에서 ResponseEntity 사용 시, ApiResponse을 사용한 방식으로 처리하기로 얘기되었으니, 리팩토링 때는 그 방식으로 적용해주시면 좋을 것 같아요~! 예시 코드는 #56 PR 내용 참고해주시면 됩니다~!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
다음번 커밋에 리팩토링 하겠습니다.
@OneToOne | ||
@JoinColumn(name = "member_no", nullable = false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ OneToOne → 즉시로딩(EAGER), nullable = false → 내부조인인데 member 정보를 가져오지 못하는 경우가 생길 수도 있을 것 같아요..!
이건 근데 제가 확인해보진 못한 부분이라 추후 테스트코드를 통해 확인이 필요해보입니다!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
원투원은 기본 속성이 즉시로딩인건가요? join명세에서 nullable false일 경우 무조건 데이터를 가지고 있어야 한다로 추측이 되는데 발생하는 부작용이 어떤 것인지 자세한 설명을 듣고싶습니다.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OneToOne 의 기본 Default값은 Eager로 확인됩니다.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
확인해보니 지연 로딩을 방지하기위해 조회시 무조건 다 가져오는 구조이네요 프론트분하고 의논해서 판단했을 때 부가정보 등록페이지 접근시 맴버와 부가정보를 같이 가져 올 필요가 없다면 연관관계 맵핑을 수정해서 별도로 조회하게끔 해도 된다 보여집니다.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
번거로우시겠지만 엔티티 관련이 반복적으로 코드가 수정되어서 이부분은 결정 후 픽스하고 맞췄으면 좋겠습니다.
import jakarta.persistence.*; | ||
import lombok.Getter; | ||
import lombok.Setter; | ||
|
||
import java.util.List; | ||
|
||
@Getter | ||
@Setter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
entity에서 setter는 꼭 없애주세요
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
반영했습니다. Setter는 JPA buddy 작성과정에서 생긴것으로 보입니다. 각 도메인에서 필요없으시면 각자 삭제해주시면 될거 같습니다.
import org.springframework.data.jpa.repository.JpaRepository; | ||
|
||
public interface AuthRepository extends JpaRepository <Auth, Id> { | ||
public interface AuthRepository extends JpaRepository <Auth, Long> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
JpaRepository의 <> 매개변수중 Id는 기본적으로 Long 타입인데, Long으로 바꾸신 이유가 무엇인지 궁금합니다.
참고로 리포지터리에 Id라고 명시하면 엔티티의 @id 애노테이션이 부여된 필드를 바라보게 되어있는걸로 알고있는데, 제가 잘못알고있으면 교정 부탁드립니다.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
오 하나 배웠네요~ 몰랐습니다
@OneToOne | ||
@JoinColumn(name = "member_no", nullable = false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
원투원은 기본 속성이 즉시로딩인건가요? join명세에서 nullable false일 경우 무조건 데이터를 가지고 있어야 한다로 추측이 되는데 발생하는 부작용이 어떤 것인지 자세한 설명을 듣고싶습니다.
@@ -18,6 +19,9 @@ public class Brand extends BaseEntity { | |||
@Column(name = "brand_name", nullable = false, length = Integer.MAX_VALUE) | |||
private String brandName; | |||
|
|||
@OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "brand") | |||
private List<Product> productList; | |||
|
|||
@Column(name = "description", length = Integer.MAX_VALUE) | |||
private String description; | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, the code appears to be fine with a few minor suggestions for improvement:
- In the import statements, make sure to organize them and remove any unused imports.
- Consider using specific annotations from JPA (such as @onetomany) instead of relying on vendor-specific annotations (e.g., jakarta.persistence.OneToMany).
- Add the
@OrderBy
annotation to specify the ordering of the products in theproductList
field if necessary. - Ensure that the
BaseEntity
class is implemented correctly and provides the required functionality for your application. - Consider adding appropriate validation annotations or constraints to ensure data integrity (e.g., validating the length of the brand name).
Here's an updated version of the code with the suggested improvements:
package com.kernel360.brand.entity;
import com.kernel360.base.BaseEntity;
import com.kernel360.product.entity.Product;
import javax.persistence.*;
import java.util.List;
@Entity
@Table(name = "brand")
public class Brand extends BaseEntity {
@Column(name = "brand_name", nullable = false)
private String brandName;
@OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "brand")
private List<Product> productList;
@Column(name = "description", length = Integer.MAX_VALUE)
private String description;
// Constructors, getters, and setters
}
Remember to review the changes carefully and adapt them to your specific requirements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@OnetoOne 기본은 Eager 로 되어 있습니다. null 관련 사항은 jpa프로그래밍 책 298쪽 내용 참고로 첨부하겠습니다. 저도 정확히 이해를 못했는데, 혹시 이해가 되시면 저도 설명 좀 부탁드리겠습니다.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#59 (comment) 이쪽에 제 생각을 적어두었습니다
@OneToOne | ||
@JoinColumn(name = "member_no", nullable = false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
확인해보니 지연 로딩을 방지하기위해 조회시 무조건 다 가져오는 구조이네요 프론트분하고 의논해서 판단했을 때 부가정보 등록페이지 접근시 맴버와 부가정보를 같이 가져 올 필요가 없다면 연관관계 맵핑을 수정해서 별도로 조회하게끔 해도 된다 보여집니다.
…onflict solving
💡 Motivation and Context
여기에 왜 이 PR이 필요했는지, PR을 통해 무엇이 바뀌는지에 대해서 설명해 주세요
🔨 Modified
🌟 More
📋 커밋 전 체크리스트
🤟🏻 PR로 완료된 이슈
closes #