Skip to content

🌳🪚 An experimental tree shaker for JS based on Oxc (WIP)

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

KermanX/tree-shaker

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Experimental Tree Shaker

[WIP] This is an experimental tree shaker for JS based on Oxc.

Note

I am currently busy with my schoolwork, so the development of this project will be slow in few months. I promise this project won't be abandoned.

Features

  • Simulate the runtime behavior of the code, instead of applying rules.
  • Single AST pass - Analyzer as much information as possible.
  • As accurate as possible. test262 is used for testing.
  • May not be the fastest. (But I will try my best)
  • Will have the ability to tree-shake React components props soon

Demo

Tree shake the following code (this already works!):

export function f() {
  function g(a) {
    if (a) console.log("effect");
    else return "str";
  }
  let { ["x"]: y = 1 } = { x: g("") ? undefined : g(1) };
  return y;
}

To:

export function f() {
  return 1;
}

Although the code above is very simple to analyze, but achieving this effect correctly for every codebase requires a lot of work - JS is too dynamic.

Comparison

  • Rollup: Rollup is great but somehow I couldn't understand its codebase. I hope this project can be more readable and maintainable. Currently, for the same code, this project can produce code roughly 2% smaller than Rollup (both after minification via uglify-js) for a Vue starter app.
  • Closure Compiler: Closure Compiler can be considered as a tree shaker + minifier, while this project is only a tree shaker (for the minifier, we have oxc_minifier). Theoretically, we can shake more than Closure Compiler, but we cannot compare them directly because we don't have a equivalent minifier. Also, it's written in Java, which is hard to be integrated into the JS ecosystem.
  • swc: swc can also be considered as a tree shaker + minifier. TBH, currently swc is much faster than this project and more complete. But it's rule-based, which is a different approach from this project. It's also not compatible with the Oxc project, thus a new tree shaker is needed.

Todo

  • Performance!
  • JS Builtins metadata
  • Test against fixtures from other tree shakers like Rollup
  • Rollup-like try-scope optimization/de-optimization
  • Reuse code with oxc_minifier for JS computation logics
  • Type narrowing
  • Multiple-module support

Basic Approach

  1. Parse the code via oxc_parser.
  2. Build the semantic information via oxc_semantic.
  3. Tree shake the code.
    • Emulate the runtime behavior of the code. (Control flow, Side effects, ...)
    • Analyze the possible runtime values of the variables.
    • Remove the dead code.
  4. Minify the code via oxc_minifier. (Optional)

Concepts

  • Entity: Represents the analyzed information of a JS value.
  • Consumable: Entity or AST Nodes or some other things that the runtime value of Entity depends on.
  • Scopes:
    • Call Scope: Function call scope.
    • Cf Scope: Control flow scope.
    • Variable Scope: Variable scope.
    • Try Scope: Try statement or function.