Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: dotGov to GitHub org mapping #174

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

IanLee1521
Copy link
Contributor

Example of what a new GH - Gov org mapping might look like.

This is meant to be a proof of concept, and needs to be fleshed out further.

cc/ @h-m-f-t @konklone

This is meant to be a proof of concept, and needs to be fleshed out further.
@h-m-f-t
Copy link
Contributor

h-m-f-t commented Sep 21, 2018

I think I'm following your goal, but maybe say some more?

This is similar to what https://code.gov/#!/policy-guide/docs/compliance/inventory-code is trying to achieve, only through centralization instead of trawling agency code.json's. Is the goal to have the GitHub org align with the sub-organizational structure of the agency, or just the parent agency?

@IanLee1521
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure. Sorry about that.

My goal would be to create an authoritative mapping of GitHub organizations to Agencies (and sub-components).

Right now something like this is done non-authoritatively, and at a much coarser level with the https://government.github.com/community/ under the U.S. Federal, U.S. Military and Intelligence, and U.S. Research Labs sections. But that doesn't divide those up / "assign" them to agencies.

@jcastle may also be interested in this, as I know he has done a fair bit of work with that community listing and adding to it.

@afomi
Copy link

afomi commented Apr 6, 2020

Still valid?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants