Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ASCII-1613] Split dogstatsd/replay into new component hierarchy #25512

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pgimalac
Copy link
Contributor

@pgimalac pgimalac commented May 10, 2024

What does this PR do?

Split comp/dogstats/replay into multiple packages for the component, fx, and implementations.

Motivation

Removing some dependencies from serverless.
When everything is in the same package you get everything at once whether you want it or not.

Additional Notes

This PR should be easier to review commit by commit:

  1. component interface, exported types, variables/consts
  2. mock interface and fx mock module
  3. implementation fx module
  4. everything else into implementation

Remaining commits are small and address review comments.

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

QA is handled in #25442

@pgimalac pgimalac added changelog/no-changelog team/agent-metrics-logs component framework qa/done Skip QA week as QA was done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels May 10, 2024
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented May 10, 2024

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: 442605d
Comparison: 97faa56

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
agentlinuxarm64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
agentwindowsamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
agentwindows386
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
agentdarwinamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
agentdarwinarm64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
iot-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
iot-agentlinuxarm64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
heroku-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
cluster-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
cluster-agentlinuxarm64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
dogstatsdlinuxamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
dogstatsdlinuxarm64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
security-agentlinuxamd64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
security-agentlinuxarm64
+3, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/fx
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
serverlesslinuxamd64
+2, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl
serverlesslinuxarm64
+2, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 10, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=34820319 --os-family=ubuntu

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 10, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: e5185d20-8748-432a-816a-28cc40e629d6
Baseline: 442605d
Comparison: 97faa56

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +11.65 [-10.54, +33.84]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +2.37 [-0.54, +5.27]
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +1.38 [-1.26, +4.02]
idle memory utilization +0.36 [+0.32, +0.40]
file_tree memory utilization +0.07 [-0.06, +0.19]
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.03 [-0.02, +0.07]
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.35, +0.39]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.20, +0.20]
trace_agent_json ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01]
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00]
pycheck_1000_100byte_tags % cpu utilization -0.77 [-5.25, +3.71]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@pgimalac pgimalac marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2024 15:04
@pgimalac pgimalac requested review from a team as code owners May 13, 2024 15:04
comp/dogstatsd/replay/def/component.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
comp/dogstatsd/replay/mock/mock.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 47.73%. Comparing base (442605d) to head (97faa56).
Report is 15 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl/capture.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
comp/dogstatsd/listeners/uds_common.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
comp/dogstatsd/replay/impl/util_linux.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #25512       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   45.01%   47.73%    +2.72%     
===========================================
  Files        2314      242     -2072     
  Lines      266339    21285   -245054     
===========================================
- Hits       119885    10160   -109725     
+ Misses     136896    10614   -126282     
+ Partials     9558      511     -9047     
Flag Coverage Δ
amzn_aarch64 47.70% <40.00%> (+1.90%) ⬆️
centos_x86_64 47.71% <40.00%> (+1.99%) ⬆️
ubuntu_aarch64 47.71% <40.00%> (+1.90%) ⬆️
ubuntu_x86_64 47.67% <40.00%> (+1.87%) ⬆️
windows_amd64 49.74% <44.44%> (-1.49%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can see there are a few of replaydef "github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def" in the PR. Maybe for consistency, we should rename them all to replay "github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/dogstatsd/replay/def"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component framework qa/done Skip QA week as QA was done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-metrics-logs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants