Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

APM: don't delete decision maker tag from span #25485

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 13, 2024

Conversation

ajgajg1134
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Don't remove _dd.p.dm from the span tags it's found on. This was originally added when simplifying the logic here for later parts of the agent (where it seemed this was allowed, but given that functionally we didn't do this before this ended up being a breaking change :( )

Motivation

There are some upstream systems that do not look at the trace chunk level attributes so by deleting the span level tag here we inadvertently break those systems.

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

There's a marginal increase in the amount of data here

Describe how to test/QA your changes

Verify that the upstream systems for this are able to detect the decision maker (check with me for confirmation)

@ajgajg1134 ajgajg1134 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2024 15:23
@ajgajg1134 ajgajg1134 added this to the 7.55.0 milestone May 9, 2024
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 9, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=34057565 --os-family=ubuntu

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 9, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 7b567828-ea6e-4f1f-a39b-9d46f3baa5d9
Baseline: 49f6e7f
Comparison: 9bcecea

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

Significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -98.30 [-102.45, -94.15]

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization -2.05 [-7.44, +3.33]

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +1.36 [-1.53, +4.25]
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +0.86 [-1.78, +3.50]
pycheck_1000_100byte_tags % cpu utilization +0.49 [-4.12, +5.11]
file_tree memory utilization +0.44 [+0.34, +0.54]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.20, +0.21]
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00]
trace_agent_json ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01]
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.04 [-0.08, -0.00]
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.13 [-0.49, +0.23]
idle memory utilization -0.15 [-0.19, -0.11]
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization -2.05 [-7.44, +3.33]
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -98.30 [-102.45, -94.15]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@knusbaum
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented May 13, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue

Pull request added to the queue.

This build is next! (estimated merge in less than 51m)

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit adf6116 into main May 13, 2024
199 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the andrew.glaude/dontMoveToChunk branch May 13, 2024 21:20
agent-platform-auto-pr bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
ajgajg1134 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
(cherry picked from commit adf6116)

Co-authored-by: Andrew Glaude <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants