Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests around the Omnibus cache and make duration management safer #25478

Merged
merged 8 commits into from May 13, 2024

Conversation

alopezz
Copy link
Contributor

@alopezz alopezz commented May 9, 2024

What does this PR do?

  • Adds test for most common scenarios around the Omnibus cache management.
  • Small refactor around how durations are collected to reduce the likelihood of causing job failures unnecessarily.

Motivation

Two recent failures:

  • A flaky one around cache corruption.
  • Breaking main for all cache hits due to flawed logic around duration collection.

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

@alopezz alopezz force-pushed the alopez/invoke-omnibus-cache-tests branch from 0a54506 to 41cc394 Compare May 9, 2024 08:49
@alopezz alopezz added qa/no-code-change Skip QA week as there is no code change in Agent code changelog/no-changelog labels May 9, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 33940124 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-developer-experience

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented May 9, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 578c4222-aeeb-43ff-9b58-85fe7d3c059e
Baseline: 1f10c8a
Comparison: 41cc394

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization +1.05 [-0.14, +2.24]

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +13.01 [-9.15, +35.16]
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization +1.05 [-0.14, +2.24]
idle memory utilization +0.47 [+0.43, +0.51]
file_tree memory utilization +0.33 [+0.24, +0.42]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.12 [-2.71, +2.96]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.20, +0.20]
trace_agent_json ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01]
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.03, +0.03]
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.02, +0.00]
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.04 [-0.41, +0.33]
process_agent_standard_check_with_stats memory utilization -0.16 [-0.20, -0.11]
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -0.31 [-2.64, +2.02]
process_agent_standard_check memory utilization -0.35 [-0.40, -0.29]
process_agent_real_time_mode memory utilization -1.08 [-1.13, -1.04]
pycheck_1000_100byte_tags % cpu utilization -2.24 [-6.98, +2.50]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@alopezz
Copy link
Contributor Author

alopezz commented May 13, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented May 13, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue

Pull request added to the queue.

This build is going to start soon! (estimated merge in less than 26m)

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 745e942 into main May 13, 2024
197 of 198 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the alopez/invoke-omnibus-cache-tests branch May 13, 2024 08:21
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.55.0 milestone May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants