natural colmated cork stopper #16
Conversation
| </teiHeader> | ||
| <text> | ||
| <body> | ||
| <entry xml:id="cork.terminology" xml:lang="pt"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you probably want to include the lemma in the xml:id so that you can distinguish this id from all the other entry ids. i.e. something like "cork.terminology.cork_colmated_natural_cork_stopper"
| commonly receive the designatikon of colamted cork stoppers).</note></def> | ||
| </sense> | ||
| <bibl xml:lang="en">International Guide for buying cork stoppers for still wines</bibl> | ||
| <xr type="synonymy" xml:lang="pt"></xr><form><orth>rolha de cortiça colmatada</orth></form> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since we're pretending this is a semasiological dictionary, I would say that this is probably a translation equivalent rather than a cross-reference.
| <def> | ||
| <bibl type="standard">ISO FDIS 633</bibl> <pc>-</pc> cork stopper made | ||
| from natural corkwood <pc>.</pc> | ||
| <note> NOTE: Natural cork stoppers having been colmated |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would probably keep the note outside of def because I don't think the note is part of the definition itself
| disks with a mixture of glue and cork powder coming from finishing cork stopers) | ||
| commonly receive the designatikon of colamted cork stoppers).</note></def> | ||
| </sense> | ||
| <bibl xml:lang="en">International Guide for buying cork stoppers for still wines</bibl> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what is this <bibl> reference for — the note? or the entry as a whole?
| </teiHeader> | ||
| <text> | ||
| <body> | ||
| <entry xml:id="cork.terminology" xml:lang="pt"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, the xml:lang should probably be "en" because your "lemma" is an English word
No description provided.