Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand ZividBenchmark #88

Open
SatjaSivcev opened this issue Apr 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Expand ZividBenchmark #88

SatjaSivcev opened this issue Apr 18, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@SatjaSivcev
Copy link
Contributor

SatjaSivcev commented Apr 18, 2020

  • Create Tutorial with terminal command: ./ZividBenchmark | tee results.txt (must be powershell for Windows)
  • add binaries for win and ubuntu
@nedrebo
Copy link

nedrebo commented Apr 20, 2020

I think binaries should be distributed as part of SDK. That will make it easier for end users, which must install the SDK anyway to be able to run the proposed binaries.

Including it the SDK will also reduce the overhead since it is already distributed and versioned. A new distribution channel for binaries as proposed here will require extra work to set up and continuous extra work to maintain when we release new SDK version.

I propose to remove the seconds point from this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants