You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
The output could use some work, it's a bit odd that tearoff and apply got pretty similar output.
All commands should probably have a summary message at the end such as "Patches de-applied.", "Project now a git repo.", etc.
Secondly "Patching X with Y..." is a bit too generic. While tearoff do patch the clone, the end result is to remove patches. "Processing" would be a more applicable generic term, but we might still want to use "Patching" when, well, patching and applying.
Thirdly, "Cloning a working copy" could be better than "Cloning".
Diff could do a "No differences found." using drush_log().
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The output could use some work, it's a bit odd that tearoff and apply got pretty similar output.
All commands should probably have a summary message at the end such as "Patches de-applied.", "Project now a git repo.", etc.
Secondly "Patching X with Y..." is a bit too generic. While tearoff do patch the clone, the end result is to remove patches. "Processing" would be a more applicable generic term, but we might still want to use "Patching" when, well, patching and applying.
Thirdly, "Cloning a working copy" could be better than "Cloning".
Diff could do a "No differences found." using drush_log().
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: