You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure why the timestamps are so far off, but based on the events above, I'm wondering if the following race condition occurred:
2018-07-03 03:30:43 GMT: postgres-03 attempts to get the WAL segment from postgres-01 but fails
2018-07-03 03:31:xx GMT: postgres-01 downloads the WAL segment into the filesystem
Does this mean Wal-E shouldn't be used this way, or is there tuning (short of adding a delay) that would help?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm trying to use Wal-E in this way:
There is one secondary configured to use Wal-E from an S3 bucket. Several other secondaries connect to this node via replication slots.
For a few days, this seems to work fine. However, once every week or so, I find that one of the secondaries stops replication with a message such as:
On this node, I see this segment has an earlier timestamp and a different MD5 sum:
On the secondary, I see:
I'm not sure why the timestamps are so far off, but based on the events above, I'm wondering if the following race condition occurred:
Does this mean Wal-E shouldn't be used this way, or is there tuning (short of adding a delay) that would help?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: