Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using the official nodejs images vs mhart #221

Closed
jtslear opened this issue Jan 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider using the official nodejs images vs mhart #221

jtslear opened this issue Jan 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@jtslear

Comments

@jtslear
Copy link
Contributor

jtslear commented Jan 4, 2017 •
edited
Loading

No description provided.

@jtslear
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtslear commented Jan 6, 2017

mhart/alpine-node#76

@jtslear jtslear self-assigned this Jan 6, 2017
@jtslear
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtslear commented Jan 6, 2017

I'm not going to perform work, but I would like to keep track of the above issue for future reference. In general, the official node images will add between 40-80MB of size to our own images. I like how small they are. Plus when we upgraded to the newer version of node, we brought in updated versions of alpine anyways. I don't think the effort needed for this story is worth performing any work. Pending the outcome of the above issue may change this opinion. But for the time being, I'm liking mhart's image over the official nodejs image.

@jtslear jtslear closed this as completed Jan 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jtslear jtslear

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jtslear