You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 7:37 PM Yuelong Logan Chen ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi there,
Nice tool, but I have been confused by the max_problem_size setting.
for s, e in zip(fixed_c_idxs[:-1], fixed_c_idxs[1:]):
assert e-s+1 <= max_problem_size+5
in the segment (line 712)
Why raise an error here rather than skip the unsatisfied pair index.
Looking forward to your reply,
Logan
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#31>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABP6AOPTJRV3C5MXM6XXJ2LTXORGRANCNFSM5AIAXA3A>
.
--
Baraa Orabi
PhD Student
Vancouver Prostate Centre
Hi there,
Nice tool, but I have been confused by the max_problem_size setting.
in the segment (line 712)
Why raise an error here rather than skip the unsatisfied pair index.
Looking forward to your reply,
Logan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: