enable support for mutli-mount entry.

[elqr]

$key in autofs/manifests/mapping.pp and autofs/types/fs_mapping.pp should allow a space character.
Current pattern Pattern[/\A\S+\z/] does not allow offeset directories or directories with a space in the name. Proposed new pattern: Pattern[/\A\S+.*\z/]

From autofs docs:
centos autofs docs

mount-point options location
where:
mount-point is the autofs mount point. This can be a single directory name for an indirect mount or the full path of the mount point for direct mounts. Each direct and indirect map entry key (mount-point above) may be followed by a space separated list of offset directories (sub directory names each beginning with a "/") making them what is known as a mutli-mount entry.

Sample code:

autofs::mapfile {
    '/mnt/example':
        path     => '/etc/auto.example',
        mappings => [
            { 'key' => "example /Company\\ Home", 'options' => 'rw,soft,intr', 'fs' => 'server.example.com:/shares' }
        ]
}

[dhollinger]

Updated description to better reflect the goal of this issue.

Will take a look as soon as I can, though we will accept PRs.

[dhollinger]

While this issue is unexpected behavior from @elqr's perspective, this is functionally a feature request rather than a bug report as this is currently functioning as intended.

[knightcraw]

Is this planned also for multi support in auto.master as well?
I also get the syntax error when use multi map in auto.master

Error: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 500 on SERVER: Server Error: Evaluation Error: Error while evaluating a Resource Statement, Autofs::Mount[mount]: parameter 'mapfile' expects a match for Variant[Stdlib::Windowspath = Pattern[/^(([a-zA-Z]:[\/])|([\/][\/][^\\\/]+[\/][^\\\/]+)|([\/][\/]?[\/][^\\\/]+))/], Stdlib::Unixpath = Pattern[/^/([^\/\0]+/)$/], Autofs::Mapentry = Pattern[/\A([a-z]+(,[a-z]+)?:\S+|-hosts)\z/]], got 'multi ldap:ou=auto.mount,ou=site1,dc=example,dc=com -- ldap:ou=auto.mount,ou=all,ou=views,dc=example,dc=com'

[dhollinger]

When I can get around to it, yes. However, it will be some time before I will make it back around to this codebase. We will accept PRs or I can ping someone in the community to see if they have time to try and tackle this

[lschweiss-wustl]

FYI, I just submitted a PR ( #164 ) that adds multi-mount support.