Interpretation of Figure 8

[andrew-zentner]

Do you have any clue why the magnitude of the MCFs is much larger for $c_{\mathrm{V}}$ than for
$c_{\mathrm{NFW}}? I have one hypothesis that you should check. My hypothesis is that $c_{\mathrm{V}}$ is measured with less noise from the simulation data. You can check this in two
ways. First, plot the one-point distribution (i.e., PDF) of the $c_{\mathrm{V}}$ mark and compare it to the one-point distribution of the $c_{\mathrm{NFW}}$ mark. If my hypothesis is correct, the PDF of $c_{\mathm{V}}$ should be narrower and have few significant outliers. Second, show my the plot for the correlation functions (not MCFs) for a couple of percentiles of $c_{\mathrm{V}}$. These should show an effect that is larger in magnitude. Show me both of these plots as soon as you can so I can write this interpretation in the text.