New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optional TailwindCSS #584
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Feature Request
Optional TailwindCSS
Description
satori
has built-in TailwindCSS (experimental) support, but should this be a built-in feature? not all developers prefer to use TailwindCSS.Example API overview
wrapper-like
hook-like
This make
satori
more framework-agnostic, more performant and smaller bundle-size (especially for edge-runtime,worker,deno).Then if TailwindCSS is still a built-in feature, why doesn't
satori
support UnoCSS(attributify,variant-group) or even MasterCSS?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: