You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have to move beyond the idea that one design will be the "most accessible". People can have contradictory needs, and our technology can accommodate that. All major operating systems and browsers support a range of personalization features which are not supported by the USWDS.
I think we should start with Dark Mode. Not everyone will benefit from it, but respecting users choice is always a good idea. Many users have specified that they prefer Dark Mode, so why ignore that?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
We have to move beyond the idea that one design will be the "most accessible". People can have contradictory needs, and our technology can accommodate that. All major operating systems and browsers support a range of personalization features which are not supported by the USWDS.
prefers-color-scheme
prefers-contrast
prefers-reduced-motion
I think we should start with Dark Mode. Not everyone will benefit from it, but respecting users choice is always a good idea. Many users have specified that they prefer Dark Mode, so why ignore that?
So how do we build the USWDS to provide better support for user preferences.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions