You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Acknowledging that the Figma file is a beta release, two requests for future releases:
Folders, groups and components are semantically named (as opposed to 'object 999') to reinforce best practices for file organization and make it easier to locate items in a frame
Naming and formatting of components should match what is in the code (ex. change ‘USA Banner’ to ‘usa-banner’) so it’s easy for developers to locate components in dev mode and match up with their code
Thanks for all the great work that went into this so far!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks! I'm 100% on-board for #1, and that'll be one of our next tasks: cleaning up the layer structure in the components.
I'm a little less sure about #2. I see the benefit in consistency between design and frontend with a common naming convention, but I worry that it could seem a little too code-forward for designers. I'm certainly open to it, but I'd like to ask around a bit more to get a sense of how that change might affect usability and tone.
Acknowledging that the Figma file is a beta release, two requests for future releases:
Thanks for all the great work that went into this so far!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: