You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
Rather than providing entire images to a classifier, it might work better to identify areas of interest as a first step and apply the classifier within those areas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@gsganden How it will work if area of interest is more then one in image like cat and dog classification where we look for different features at different parts of image?Specially selecting more then one area of interest in a single image.
It is quite rare to have multiple types of animals in the same image, so we can probably get away with not worrying about the case, at least on a first pass.
It is fairly common to have multiple instances of certain types of animals (e.g. raccoons) in one image. Some kind of averaging or similar over multiple detected areas should work pretty well, I think.
Does that help? What do you think?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
cvComputer vision workr&dResearch & Development, i.e. a promising but unproven idea
Rather than providing entire images to a classifier, it might work better to identify areas of interest as a first step and apply the classifier within those areas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: