Index free syntax #204
Open
Index free syntax #204
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
now ignore whitespace
andrevidela
commented
Jun 19, 2020
andrevidela
commented
Jun 19, 2020
Co-authored-by: Erik Post <[email protected]>
andrevidela
force-pushed
the
index-free-syntax
branch
from
c8ec5b2
to
e6883b9
Compare
|
The merge for this is going to take a bit longer than expected |
|
Actually this is going to take a lot more work than expected. Indeed this is not compatible anymore with the current master in which we only allow to generate code for TDefs with resolved references. This commit, is the culprit and makes the change from So either we rewrite the reference compiler or we rewrite the syntax compiler. Eitherway, it's not a trivial and easy task |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR add support for a new index-free syntax which more closely resembles ml-style languages with data constructors:
fix #164
fix #175
fix #23