You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently our license permits us to take code from aquatic's repository, however, we are not able to return the favor of allowing our code to be copied by @greatest-ape.
It should be noted that we in-fact already depend on some of aquatic's code by using the crate: UDP BitTorrent tracker protocol to support our udp tracker implementation.
Question: Are there any real benefits for using the AGPL for Torrust-Tracker?
Question: Do you support the idea of moving Torrust Tracker to the "Apache License 2.0" and are also happy to change the license of your contributions in support ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed in #136
Originally posted by da2ce7 October 30, 2022
Hello @WarmBeer,
I would like to propose that we change the license of this repository (Torrust Tracker) to the Apache License 2.0.
My primary motivation for promoting this change is to have bi-directional license comparably with the aquatic: high-performance open BitTorrent tracker.
Currently our license permits us to take code from aquatic's repository, however, we are not able to return the favor of allowing our code to be copied by @greatest-ape.
It should be noted that we in-fact already depend on some of aquatic's code by using the crate: UDP BitTorrent tracker protocol to support our udp tracker implementation.
Other Contributors: @naim94a @Power2All @josecelano @da2ce7 @pataquets @Aimless321 @ftsimas @makefu
In-Copy @cgbosse
Question: Are there any real benefits for using the AGPL for Torrust-Tracker?
Question: Do you support the idea of moving Torrust Tracker to the "Apache License 2.0" and are also happy to change the license of your contributions in support ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: