-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement atomic-await #306
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi!
Thanks a lot for this very impressive crate.
I'm trying to use it on rendezvous but I can't because I'm depending on @m-ou-se atomic-wait.
I've tried using mock implementations like:
but this unfortunately leads to "Model exceeded maximum number of branches. This is often caused by an algorithm requiring the processor to make progress, e.g. spin locks." in some cases that would be relevant to the tests.
If feasible, I think that having atomic-wait supported by loom would be great!
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: