-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for RV32EC (embedded) configuration? #23
Comments
First off, thanks for considering bronzebeard and bringing this up! I haven't looked into So, I'd assume that bronzebeard would already support these chips in the sense that the user would be responsible for only using valid registers ( Similarly, such a feature could probably be applied to other scenarios: (using |
I did a blinky on CH32V003 chip with bronzebeard and was successful |
DID a sample usart TX with bronzebeard for CH32V003 and was successful. crude code in my repository |
I love the minimal no-nonsense approach of this project (which I found when looking for a Risc-V assembler FORTH and finding Derzforth) and it seems a great fit for embedded development on small Risc-V microcontrollers. There are now some interesting, and very low cost, Risc-V chips and development boards available which use the RV32EC configuration (rather than the fuller RV32IMAC) such as the CH32V003 "ten cent" chip which has caught a lot of media attention. I would love to be able to use bronzebeard to develop software for these as well as the more expensive Longan and SiFive boards which you support.
Would you consider adding RV32EC support in bronzebeard?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: