You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
as there is no inherent ordering in this list. Internally we'd have to assign enum values, sure, but nice it the user didn't have to. (Longer term, perhaps if it's declared without ordinals then you wouldn't be able to treat it as if it had them. Someday when we have a real type system, maybe)
At the moment, however, the problem is Technique.Parser will fail parsing disciplines because of the lack of ~ binding characters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now we have this syntax for declaring enumerations, which is using a tablet to represent them and listing their ordinal values:
For things that are categorical, however, it would be nice to be able to use a list of labels:
as there is no inherent ordering in this list. Internally we'd have to assign enum values, sure, but nice it the user didn't have to. (Longer term, perhaps if it's declared without ordinals then you wouldn't be able to treat it as if it had them. Someday when we have a real type system, maybe)
At the moment, however, the problem is Technique.Parser will fail parsing
disciplines
because of the lack of~
binding characters.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: