-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 515
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Infill pattern doesn't rotate with the object #4304
Comments
been frustrated by this for a while |
I'm actually quite amazed this wasn't fixed years ago. I have found this same flaw in Cura and Orca too. Very peculiar phenomenon. |
I can adjust it but when you have multiple part into an object, the rotation should be:
Also, when the rotation has 3 components, the z rotation used is: |
I can't imagine when and why should infill angle be related to the platter. Whenever the infill angle matters, it's always adjusted to the appropriate fit inside particular perimeter. So any consequential automatic change of the infill angle in relation to the perimeter, for whatever reason (in this case rotation, regardless if it's multi or solo), is actually a problem which has to be manually inspected and manually corrected, to preserve infill angle related to perimeter as originally desired. So to put it pragmatic, the infill connection points to the perimeter should be considered as GLUED to the perimeter in original object position, for whatever rotation it done. I guess this means that angle degrees should be calculated to perimeter plan. Yes, there could be many perimeters in various positions, rounded as well, but starting position doesn't matter much because user adjust afterwards precisely when observing, inspecting. Or the starting point could be related to platter, but once the infill is there it should become a matter of perimeter. The important thing is it should stay the way it was set. |
Maybe an easy right click "set infill angle" would be better. You are never
going to have the infill right all the time based on a preconfigured
setting. So just make it easier to modify
…On Tue, Jun 11, 2024, 10:22 Merill ***@***.***> wrote:
Here I set manually the first object to 0° angle and the second to 45°, as
it's rotated by 45°, is it what you want the software to do automatically?
image.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/supermerill/SuperSlicer/assets/6536403/df609646-3553-4614-a7af-414f80fcaf99>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4304 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGDEEYPRAXFOBJSDJJ2L3LZG4B4HAVCNFSM6AAAAABI7XZQD2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRQHA4TOOJUGY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
That's a pity because this is exactly what I have in mind.
I never thought about it. Now, this changes the whole approach in rearranging the position of the object(s). |
As I already made it clear, I'm not familiar with coding of such a complex program as slicer. But, what comes to my mind is to make a check box which adds or subtracts angle degrees to anything related to filling/ironing, in direct relation to XYZ rotation of the object. |
added a setting to follow the object's rotation, as it's easy enough to add and it makes sense. |
Related to all SS versions. Unfortunately, it is coming all the way from Prusa.
Infill has a defined filling angle.
When model gets rotated, the infill angle doesn't follow the model position/rotation, but a relative position to the build plate. That messes up complete infill pattern, otherwise precisely defined for object's requirements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: